Privacy and Fairness Analysis in the Post-Processed Differential Privacy Framework

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Kai [1 ]
Gao, Longxiang [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Jinjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Comp Technol, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
[2] Qilu Univ Technol, Shandong Comp Sci Ctr, Key Lab Comp Power Network & Informat Secur, Minist Educ,Shandong Acad Sci, Jinan 250316, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Fundamental Res Ctr Comp Sci, Shandong Prov Key Lab Comp Power Internet & Serv C, Jinan 250000, Peoples R China
关键词
Privacy; Accuracy; Differential privacy; Noise; Resource management; Vectors; Three-dimensional displays; Standards; Sensitivity; Optimization methods; consistency; non-negativity; post-processing; fairness; census data privacy; COUNTS;
D O I
10.1109/TIFS.2025.3528222
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The post-processed Differential Privacy (DP) framework has been routinely adopted to preserve privacy while maintaining important invariant characteristics of datasets in data-release applications such as census data. Typical invariant characteristics include non-negative counts and total population. Subspace DP has been proposed to preserve total population while guaranteeing DP for sub-populations. Non-negativity post-processing has been identified to inherently incur fairness issues. In this work, we study privacy and unfairness (i.e., accuracy disparity) concerns in the post-processed DP framework. On one hand, we propose the post-processed DP framework with both non-negativity and accurate total population as constraints would inadvertently violate privacy guarantee desired by it. Instead, we propose the post-processed subspace DP framework to accurately define privacy guarantees against adversaries. On the other hand, we identify unfairness level is dependent on privacy budget, count sizes as well as their imbalance level via empirical analysis. Particularly concerning is severe unfairness in the setting of strict privacy budgets. We further trace unfairness back to uniform privacy budget setting over different population subgroups. To address this, we propose a varying privacy budget setting method and develop optimization approaches using ternary search and golden ratio search to identify optimal privacy budget ranges that minimize unfairness while maintaining privacy guarantees. Our extensive theoretical and empirical analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of our approaches in addressing severe unfairness issues across different privacy settings and several canonical privacy mechanisms. Using datasets of Australian Census data, Adult dataset, and delinquent children by county and household head education level, we validate both our privacy analysis framework and fairness optimization methods, showing significant reduction in accuracy disparities while maintaining strong privacy guarantees.
引用
收藏
页码:2412 / 2423
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comparative Analysis of Differential Privacy Vs other Privacy Mechanisms for Big Data
    Begum, Sayyada Hajera
    Nausheen, Farha
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE SYSTEMS AND CONTROL (ICISC 2018), 2018, : 512 - 516
  • [22] Privacy at Scale: Local Differential Privacy in Practice
    Cormode, Graham
    Jha, Somesh
    Kulkarni, Tejas
    Li, Ninghui
    Srivastava, Divesh
    Wang, Tianhao
    SIGMOD'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF DATA, 2018, : 1655 - 1658
  • [23] Privacy-Preserving Approach PBCN in Social Network With Differential Privacy
    Huang, Haiping
    Zhang, Dongjun
    Xiao, Fu
    Wang, Kai
    Gu, Jiateng
    Wang, Ruchuan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 17 (02): : 931 - 945
  • [24] Differential privacy in deep learning: Privacy and beyond
    Wang, Yanling
    Wang, Qian
    Zhao, Lingchen
    Wang, Cong
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2023, 148 : 408 - 424
  • [25] Balancing Utility and Fairness against Privacy in Medical Data
    Chester, Andrew
    Koh, Yun Sing
    Wicker, Jorg
    Sun, Quan
    Lee, Junjae
    2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), 2020, : 1226 - 1233
  • [26] A privacy-preserving trajectory data synthesis framework based on differential privacy
    Ma, Tinghuai
    Deng, Qian
    Rong, Huan
    Al-Nabhan, Najla
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SECURITY AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 77
  • [27] A Pragmatic Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning Framework Satisfying Differential Privacy
    Dang T.K.
    Tran-Truong P.T.
    SN Computer Science, 5 (1)
  • [28] On Differential Privacy-Based Framework for Enhancing User Data Privacy in Mobile Edge Computing Environment
    Sharma, Jhilakshi
    Kim, Donghyun
    Lee, Ahyoung
    Seo, Daehee
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 38107 - 38118
  • [29] A Systematic and Formal Study of the Impact of Local Differential Privacy on Fairness: Preliminary Results
    Makhlouf, Karima
    Stefanovic, Tamara
    Arcolezi, Heber H.
    Palamidessi, Catuscia
    2024 IEEE 37TH COMPUTER SECURITY FOUNDATIONS SYMPOSIUM, CSF 2024, 2024, : 1 - 16
  • [30] A Privacy-Preserving Pedestrian Dead Reckoning Framework Based on Differential Privacy
    Feng, Tianyi
    Zhang, Zhixiang
    Wong, Wai-Choong
    Sun, Sumei
    Sikdar, Biplab
    2021 IEEE 32ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERSONAL, INDOOR AND MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS (PIMRC), 2021,