The impact of linked color imaging on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zwetkoff, Bruna Haueisen Figueiredo [1 ]
Alberti, Luiz Ronaldo [1 ]
Rodrigues, Fabio Gontijo [1 ]
Carvas Junior, Nelson [2 ]
Ardengh, Jose Celso [3 ]
Neto, Otavio Micelli [3 ]
Guzman, Fernando Rodrigues [3 ]
Dias, Marcelo Morganti Ferreira [3 ]
Canejo, Guilherme Camarotti de Oliveira [3 ]
dos Santos, Carlos Eduardo Oliveira [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Sch Med, Av Prof Alfredo Balena 190, BR-30130100 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Moriah Hosp, Endoscop Unit, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Santa Casa Caridade Bage Hosp, Bage, Brazil
关键词
Adenoma; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Diagnostic techniques and procedures; WHITE-LIGHT COLONOSCOPY; POLYPS; CANCER; MULTICENTER; LESIONS;
D O I
10.5946/ce.2024.072
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: Colorectal cancer prevention relies on surveillance colonoscopy, with the adenoma detection rate as a key factor in examination quality. Linked color imaging (LCI) enhances lesion contrast and improves the examination performance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of LCI on adenoma detection rate in adults who underwent colonoscopy. Methods: We searched the Medline, PubMed, BIREME, LILACS, and Scientific Electronic Library Online databases for randomized controlled trials comparing the use of LCI versus white light (WL), published up to March 2023. The outcomes included lesion characteristics, number of adenomas per patient, and the additional polyp detection rate. Results: Sixteen studies were included in the analysis, which showed that LCI was more accurate than WL in detecting adenomas, with an increased number of adenomas detected per patient. Although LCI performed well in terms of lesion size, morphology, and location, the subgroup analyses did not reveal any statistically significant differences between LCI and WL. The addition of LCI did not result in significant improvements in the detection of serrated lesions, and there were no differences in the withdrawal time between groups. Conclusions: LCI has been shown to be effective in detecting colonic lesions, improving the number of adenomas detected per patient and improving polyp detection rate without negatively affecting other quality criteria in colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boregowda, Umesha
    Desai, Madhav
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Paleti, Swathi
    Olyaee, Mojtaba
    Rastogi, Amit
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 34 (02): : 214 - +
  • [2] Impact of cuff-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Qi
    Gao, Hai-de
    Liu, Chun-Cheng
    Zhang, Hao
    Li, Xun-Hai
    Wu, Jia
    Zhang, Xian-Kai
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (20)
  • [3] Effects of ai-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma miss rate/adenoma detection rate: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shao, Lei
    Yan, Xinzong
    Liu, Chengjiang
    Guo, Can
    Cai, Baojia
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (46) : E31945
  • [4] Use of 2 Observers Increases Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Weissman, Simcha
    Khan, Zubair
    Fatima, Rawish
    Lee-Smith, Wade
    Nawras, Ali
    Adler, Douglas G.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 18 (05) : 1240 - +
  • [5] Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Piovani, Daniele
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Parigi, Tommaso
    Khalaf, Kareem
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Fugazza, Alessandro
    Roesch, Thomas
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Mori, Yuichi
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Bonovas, Stefanos
    Repici, Alessandro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (02) : 212 - +
  • [6] NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVICES INCREASE SESSILE SERRATED ADENOMA DETECTION RATE IN COLONOSCOPY - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Verheyen, Elijah
    Castaneda, Daniel
    Gross, Seth A.
    Popov, Violeta
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB486 - AB486
  • [7] Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Iannone, Andrea
    Maselli, Roberta
    Jovani, Manol
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Yu, Honggang
    Areia, Miguel
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Roesch, Thomas
    Wallace, Michael
    Repici, Alessandro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 77 - +
  • [8] IMPACT OF FEEDBACK ON ADENOMA DETECTION RATE: A SYTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Jeepalyam, Sravan
    Desai, Madhav
    Buckles, Daniel
    Bonino, John A.
    Bansal, Ajay
    Olyaee, Mojtaba S.
    Rastogi, Amit
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB157 - AB157
  • [9] Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fernandes, Carlos
    Estevinho, Manuela
    Cruz, Manuel Marques
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    ENDOSCOPY, 2025, 57 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [10] Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Hassan, Cesare
    La Marca, Marina
    Paci, Valentina
    Smania, Veronica
    De Bortoli, Nicola
    Bazzoli, Franco
    Repici, Alessandro
    Rex, Douglas
    Cadoni, Sergio
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 88 (04) : 589 - +