Evaluation of a self-report distress measure in a high-secure forensic population: CORE-OM psychometric properties and test structure

被引:0
作者
Gilling, Lindsey [1 ,2 ]
Hartop, Kerr [1 ]
Purcell, Natasha [2 ]
Thomson, Lindsay D. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Div Psychiat, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] State Hosp Board Scotland, Carstairs, Scotland
关键词
CORE outcome measure; outcomes; progress monitoring; forensic mental health; psychometric properties; PSYCHOSIS; PROGRAM; ESTEEM;
D O I
10.1080/14789949.2025.2468291
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a widely adopted routine patient reported outcome measures across the National Health Service mental health services, including some forensic mental health services. Yet little is known about the measurement properties of the CORE-OM for forensic patients. This study examined the psychometric properties and structure of the CORE-OM in a sample of high-secure forensic patients. T-tests confirmed forensic patients' scores fall between non-clinical and clinical normative scores. Internal consistency of the overall scale was high, though some score domains demonstrated poor reliability. Principal component analysis revealed a unique three-component structure underlying the CORE-OM items, related to life-functioning and self-worth, relational difficulties, and risk of harm to self. The findings highlight limitations to the generalisability of the original CORE-OM measurement properties to a forensic population. Further research on the CORE-OM is critical given its continued routine use in forensic mental health services.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Arnholt Alan T, 2022, CRAN, DOI 10.32614/CRAN.package.PASWR
  • [2] Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies
    Barkham, M
    Margison, F
    Leach, C
    Lucock, M
    Mellor-Clark, J
    Evans, C
    Benson, L
    Connell, J
    Audin, K
    McGrath, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 69 (02) : 184 - 196
  • [3] Barkham M., 1998, J MENT HEALTH, V7, P35, DOI DOI 10.1080/09638239818328
  • [4] A core approach to practice-based evidence: A brief history of the origins and applications of the CORE-OM and CORE System
    Barkham, Michael
    Mellor-Clark, John
    Connell, Janice
    Cahill, Jane
    [J]. COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2006, 6 (01) : 3 - 15
  • [5] Stability of the CORE-OM and the BDI-I prior to therapy: Evidence from routine practice
    Barkham, Michael
    Mullin, Tracy
    Leach, Chris
    Stiles, William B.
    Lucock, Mike
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2007, 80 : 269 - 278
  • [6] A CORE Approach to Progress Monitoring and Feedback: Enhancing Evidence and Improving Practice
    Barkham, Michael
    Mellor-Clark, John
    Stiles, William B.
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2015, 52 (04) : 402 - 411
  • [7] The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies
    Barkham, Michael
    Bewick, Bridgette
    Mullin, Tracy
    Gilbody, Simon
    Connell, Janice
    Cahill, Jane
    Mellor-Clark, John
    Richards, David
    Unsworth, Gisela
    Evans, Chris
    [J]. COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2013, 13 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [8] Evaluation of Risk by Patients' and with Clinicians' Ratings: A CORE-OM and CORE-A Investigation
    Bedford, Alan
    Lukic, Goran
    Tibbles, Jennifer
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2011, 18 (03) : 244 - 249
  • [9] Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare
    Black, Nick
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [10] Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions
    Boswell, James F.
    Kraus, David R.
    Miller, Scott D.
    Lambert, Michael J.
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (01) : 6 - 19