Decision Analysis Approaches on the Collection Methods of Polyethylene Terephthalate Waste

被引:0
|
作者
Oyewale, Johnson A. [1 ]
Tartibu, Lagouge K. [1 ]
Okokpujie, Imhade P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Mech & Ind Engn Technol, ZA-2028 Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Afe Babalola Univ, Dept Mech & Mechatron Engn, Ado 360001, Ekiti, Nigeria
关键词
PET waste; AHP; TOPSIS; VIKOR; entropy weights; equal weights; AHP;
D O I
10.3390/recycling9060124
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rising challenge of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste necessitates efficient collection methods to mitigate environmental impacts. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approaches utilized in this study. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used to rank each alternative according to the objective weight that AHP had produced. Also, sensitivity analysis was performed to determine how robust the findings were when considering equal weights and entropy weights to maximize PET waste collection techniques. The alternative achieved the objective of obtaining the best collection method, Threshold Plastic Bottle Waste Collection (Tpbw), out of all the three alternatives considered. Another MCDA approach, VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), was used to compare the results and validate the ranking result achieved by the TOPSIS method. The VIKOR technique's validation of the TOPSIS approach showed that the outcomes were highly consistent. Data for the study were gathered from the archives of waste management companies on possible practices of plastic waste collection, addressing costs, environmental impacts, social acceptance, feasibility, and efficiency. The findings provide a prioritized framework for enhancing PET waste collection strategies, contributing to sustainable waste management. Many criteria are considered when deciding the best collecting method for PET waste recycling, making it challenging. By using criteria importance, MCDA was applied in this study, and the objective weight of the criteria was determined using the AHP. The five criteria considered in this study are Initial investment cost, operational cost, transportation cost, environmental risk, employment potential, and the objective weights allocated to them. AHP results 0.4952, 0.1997, 0.1565, 0.0870, and 0.0616 are, respectively, determined.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of the relation between multicriteria decision-making methods and human decision strategies
    Lehnhart, Eliete dos Reis
    Lobler, Mauri Leodir
    BOTTOM LINE, 2024,
  • [42] A multi-criteria decision analysis of solid waste treatment options in Pakistan: Lahore City—a case in point
    Ali Y.
    Aslam Z.
    Dar H.S.
    Mumtaz U.U.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2018, 38 (4) : 528 - 543
  • [43] Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods for Optimal Treatment Selection in Network Meta-Analysis
    Bellos, Ioannis
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2023, 43 (01) : 78 - 90
  • [44] Developing the Expert Decision-Making Algorithm Using the Methods of Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Basheleishvili, Irakli
    CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 20 (02) : 22 - 29
  • [45] Recycling of polyethylene terephthalate waste bottles and zinc-carbon used batteries for preparation a MOF-based catalyst: Application in photodegradation of organophosphorus pesticides
    Yeganeh, Mojtaba
    Hatefi-Mehrjardi, Abdolhamid
    Esrafili, Ali
    Sobhi, Hamid Reza
    JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY A-CHEMISTRY, 2025, 466
  • [46] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR QUANTITATIVE DECISION MAKING METHODS: TOPSIS AND SAW
    Simanaviciene, Ruta
    Ustinovichius, Leonas
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES' 2010, 2010, : 33 - +
  • [47] ANALYSIS OF SPECIFIC STATES IN NONPARAMETRIC DECISION-MAKING METHODS
    Salehi, Kiyana
    Mehrabian, Ahmad
    Khalili, Hossein Amoozad
    Navabakhsh, Mehrzad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2022, 29 (02): : 192 - 205
  • [48] pyFDM: A Python']Python library for uncertainty decision analysis methods
    Wieckowski, Jakub
    Kizielewicz, Bartlomiej
    Salabun, Wojciech
    SOFTWAREX, 2022, 20
  • [49] The Prioritization of Critical County Municipalities According to Solid Waste Management Urgency by Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approaches: A Case Study of Florida, US
    Guner, Gurkan Guven
    5TH EURASIAN WASTE MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, EWMS 2020, 2020, : 264 - 271
  • [50] A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment
    Farahnaz Rashidi
    Shadi Sharifian
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194