Validation and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI)

被引:0
作者
Iacob, Vivien [1 ,2 ]
Carmo, Claudia [1 ,3 ]
Garces, Soraia [2 ,4 ]
Chiodelli, Roberto [1 ]
Walach, Harald [5 ,6 ]
de Jesus, Saul Neves [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Algarve, Dept Psychol & Educ Sci, Faro, Portugal
[2] Res Ctr Tourism Sustainabil & Well being CinTurs, Faro, Portugal
[3] Univ Res Ctr Psychol CUIP, Faro, Portugal
[4] Univ Madeira, Funchal, Portugal
[5] Kazimieras Simonavicius Univ, Next Soc Inst, Vilnius, Lithuania
[6] Change Hlth Sci Inst, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory; mindfulness; psychometric properties; validity; reliability; INITIAL VALIDATION; EMOTION REGULATION; PSYCHOLOGY; MEDITATION; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; PROGRAM; ACCEPTANCE; CHILD; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/09515070.2025.2471336
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This research aimed to develop a Portuguese version of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI) short form and investigate its psychometric properties through two complementary studies. The first study included a sample of 337 participants. It analyzed the scale's internal consistency, reliability, and factorial validity by conducting an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis using a randomly divided sample of the general population. The second study examined the convergent and concurrent validity, temporal stability, and sensitivity to change in the FMI among participants in an Interculturality and Mindfulness program (n = 150). The results indicated high internal consistency and reliability for the Portuguese version of FMI (omega = 0.87). The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis reinforced the instrument's unidimensional solution. The findings supported the convergent and concurrent validity, temporal stability, and sensitivity to change. The translated version's psychometric qualities are satisfactory and can be used to assess mindfulness in the Portuguese population.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion [J].
Ab Hamid, M. R. ;
Sami, W. ;
Sidek, M. H. Mohmad .
1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED & INDUSTRIAL MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS 2017 (ICOAIMS 2017), 2017, 890
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, APA Dictionary of Psychology
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ournal of Clinical Psychology, V62, P1445, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20326, DOI 10.1002/JCLP.20326]
[4]  
Arifin, 2012, ED MED J, V4, DOI [10.5959/eimj.v4i1.4, DOI 10.5959/EIMJ.V4I1.4]
[5]  
Baer R.A., 2006, Assessment: Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness, V13, P27, DOI [DOI 10.1037/T05514-000, 10.1037/t05514-000]
[6]   Assessment of mindfulness by self-report - The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills [J].
Baer, RA ;
Smith, GT ;
Allen, KB .
ASSESSMENT, 2004, 11 (03) :191-206
[7]   Methods to document semantic equivalence of a translated scale [J].
Beck, CT ;
Bernal, H ;
Froman, RD .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2003, 26 (01) :64-73
[8]   PRACTICAL ISSUES IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
CHOU, CP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1987, 16 (01) :78-117
[9]   Dispositional Mindfulness and Self-Compassion Buffer the Effects of COVID-19 Stress on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms [J].
Beshai, Shadi ;
Salimuddin, Saba ;
Refaie, Nabhan ;
Maierhoffer, Jenna .
MINDFULNESS, 2022, 13 (12) :3028-3042
[10]   Mindfulness in Daily Life: a Multidimensional Approach (vol 8, pg 737, 2017) [J].
Blanke, Elisabeth S. ;
Brose, Annette .
MINDFULNESS, 2017, 8 (06) :1727-1731