The systematic identification of appropriate sites for different rainwater harvesting (RWH) structures may contribute to better success of crop production in such areas. One approach to improving crop yields in North Kordofan, Sudan, that is mostly adaptable to the changing climate is in-field water harvesting. The main objective of this study is to employ a geographical information system (GIS) in order to identify the most suitable sites for setting in situ water harvesting structures, aiming to address climate change in this area. A GIS-based model was developed to generate suitability maps for in situ RWH using multi-criteria evaluation. Five suitability criteria (soil texture, runoff depth, rainfall surplus, land cover, and slope) were identified; then, five suitability levels were set for each criterion (excellent, good, moderate, poor, and unsuitable). Weights were assigned to the criteria based on their relative importance for RWH using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Using QGIS 2.6.1 and ArcGIS 10.2.2 software, all criterion maps and suitability maps were prepared. The obtained suitability map for the entire region showed that 40% of the region area fell within the "good" class, representing 7419.18 km2, whereas 26% of the area was "excellent", occupying 4863.75 km2. However, only 8.9% and 15.6% of the entire region's area were "poor" and "unsuitable" for RWH, respectively. The suitability map of the delineated pilot areas selected according to the attained FAO data revealed that one location, Wad_Albaga, was found to be in an excellent position, covering an area of 787.811 km2, which represents 42.94% of the total area. In contrast, the Algabal location had 6.4% of its area classified as poor and the remaining portion classified as excellent. According to the findings from the validated trial, Wad_Albaga is located in a good site covering 844 km2, representing 46.04%, while Algabal is classified as a moderate site, covering 341 km2 or 18.6% of the area. This study concluded that the validation of the existing trial closely matched the suitability map derived using FAO data. However, ground data from field experiments provided more accurate results compared to the FAO suitability map. This study also concluded that using GIS is a time-saving and effective tool for identifying suitable sites and discovering the most appropriate locations for rainwater harvesting (RWH).