Meta-Analysis Comparing Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Disease

被引:1
作者
Almizel, Abdulrahman M. [1 ]
Levett, Jeremy Y. [2 ]
Zolotarova, Tetiana [3 ]
Eisenberg, Mark J. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Div Cardiac Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; OUTCOMES; VESSEL; IMPACT; TRIAL; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) frequently present with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and the optimal timing of complete revascularization (CR) in these cases remains uncertain. This study aims to assess major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and procedural complications in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD who underwent immediate (index procedure) versus staged CR. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing immediate to staged CR in STEMI and multivessel CAD. Trials were identified by way of a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Libraries from database inception to March 6, 2024. The data were analyzed using the RevMan software. A total of 5 randomized controlled trials (n = 1,415) were included in our study, which showed no significant differences in MACEs (13.3% vs 9.8%, relative risk [RR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 1.83), all-cause mortality (3% vs 4.55%, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.21), or myocardial infarction (4.5% vs 2.6%, RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.55) at a weighted mean follow-up duration of 16 months. However, the staged group had a higher rate of unplanned revascularization (8.6% vs 4.4%, RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.04). In conclusion, in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD, at a mean follow-up of approximately 1.3 years, there is no significant difference in immediate versus staged revascularization (SR) for MACEs; however, SR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. SR within the index hospitalization may be as effective as immediate CR; further trials are needed to confirm this. We conducted a meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials comparing immediate to staged complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel coronary artery disease. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction rates between immediate and staged complete revascularization. However, staged revascularization was associated with a higher incidence of unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 81
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal Strategy for Complete Revascularization in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease
    Ueyama, Hiroki A.
    Akita, Keitaro
    Kiyohara, Yuko
    Takagi, Hisato
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Wiley, Jose
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Mehran, Roxana
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 85 (01) : 19 - 38
  • [32] Managing patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: is the story complete?
    Rymer, Jennifer A.
    Granger, Christopher B.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (42) : 4111 - 4113
  • [33] Effects of patient characteristics on the efficacy of complete revascularization for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease A meta-analysis
    Li, Lu-Feng
    Qiu, Mei
    Liu, Shu-Yan
    Zhou, Hai-Rong
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (25) : E26251
  • [34] Meta-Analysis Comparing Same-Sitting and Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Non-Culprit Artery for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Coronary Disease
    Ueyama, Hiroki
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Yasumura, Keisuke
    Vengrenyuk, Yuliya
    Takagi, Hisato
    Barman, Nitin
    Suleman, Javed
    Banning, Amerjeet Singh
    Boxma-de Klerk, Bianca M.
    Smits, Pieter C.
    Kini, Annapoorna
    Sharma, Samin K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 150 : 24 - 31
  • [35] The GRACE of Staged Revascularization After Primary Angioplasty ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Mehran, Roxana
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 77 (05) : 623 - 624
  • [36] Complete revascularization for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after the COMPLETE trial: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bajraktari, Gani
    Bytyci, Ibadete
    Henein, Michael Y.
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Ahmed, Ali
    Jashari, Haki
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2020, 29
  • [37] Optimal Revascularization Strategy for Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis
    Cui, Kongyong
    Yin, Dong
    Zhu, Chenggang
    Yuan, Sheng
    Wu, Shaoyu
    Feng, Lei
    Dou, Kefei
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 8
  • [38] Culprit Vessel Versus Multivessel Versus In-Hospital Staged Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease
    Iqbal, M. Bilal
    Nadra, Imad J.
    Ding, Lillian
    Fung, Anthony
    Aymong, Eve
    Chan, Albert W.
    Hodge, Steven
    Della Siega, Anthony
    Robinson, Simon D.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [39] Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
    Salih, Mohsin
    Ibrahim, Abdisamad M.
    Al-Akchar, Mohammad
    Bhattarai, Mukul
    Koester, Cameron
    Ayan, Mohamed
    Hafiz, Abdul Moiz
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (12) : 1482 - 1488
  • [40] Complete versus culprit only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-a perspective on recent trials and recommendations
    Andries, Gabriela
    Khera, Sahil
    Timmermans, Robert J.
    Aronow, Wilbert S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (07) : 2159 - +