Meta-Analysis Comparing Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Disease

被引:1
|
作者
Almizel, Abdulrahman M. [1 ]
Levett, Jeremy Y. [2 ]
Zolotarova, Tetiana [3 ]
Eisenberg, Mark J. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Div Cardiac Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; OUTCOMES; VESSEL; IMPACT; TRIAL; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) frequently present with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and the optimal timing of complete revascularization (CR) in these cases remains uncertain. This study aims to assess major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and procedural complications in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD who underwent immediate (index procedure) versus staged CR. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing immediate to staged CR in STEMI and multivessel CAD. Trials were identified by way of a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Libraries from database inception to March 6, 2024. The data were analyzed using the RevMan software. A total of 5 randomized controlled trials (n = 1,415) were included in our study, which showed no significant differences in MACEs (13.3% vs 9.8%, relative risk [RR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 1.83), all-cause mortality (3% vs 4.55%, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.21), or myocardial infarction (4.5% vs 2.6%, RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.55) at a weighted mean follow-up duration of 16 months. However, the staged group had a higher rate of unplanned revascularization (8.6% vs 4.4%, RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.04). In conclusion, in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD, at a mean follow-up of approximately 1.3 years, there is no significant difference in immediate versus staged revascularization (SR) for MACEs; however, SR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. SR within the index hospitalization may be as effective as immediate CR; further trials are needed to confirm this. We conducted a meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials comparing immediate to staged complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel coronary artery disease. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction rates between immediate and staged complete revascularization. However, staged revascularization was associated with a higher incidence of unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 81
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complete revascularization for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Bajraktari, Gani
    Jashari, Haki
    Ibrahimi, Pranvera
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Jashari, Fisnik
    Ndrepepa, Gjin
    Elezi, Shpend
    Henein, Michael Y.
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2018, 29 (03) : 204 - 215
  • [22] Target-Vessel Versus Multivessel Revascularisation in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials
    Sarathy, Kiran
    Nagaraja, Vinayak
    Kapur, Amit
    Szirt, Richard
    Raval, Jwalant
    Eslick, Guy D.
    Burgess, David
    Denniss, A. Robert
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2015, 24 (04) : 327 - 334
  • [23] Meta-analysis of immediate complete vs staged complete revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease
    Singh, Sahib
    Garg, Aakash
    Chaudhary, Rahul
    Rout, Amit
    Tantry, Udaya S.
    Bliden, Kevin
    Gurbelh, Paul A.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2024, 60 : 1 - 8
  • [24] Fractional flow reserve-guided complete vs. culprit-only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease: a meta-analysis
    Yang, Jingxian
    Wang, Peng
    Wan, Jun
    Li, Na
    Didi, Jiajia
    Shen, Binger
    Yang, Xinyu
    Li, Feina
    Zhang, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [25] Staged Versus One-time Complete Revascularization With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients Without ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Hannan, Edward L.
    Samadashvili, Zaza
    Walford, Gary
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Stamato, Nicholas J.
    Venditti, Ferdinand J.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Sharma, Samin
    King, Spencer B., III
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [26] Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Toklu, Bora
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (04)
  • [27] Meta-Analysis Comparing Complete Revascularization Versus Infarct-Related Only Strategies for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Shah, Rahman
    Berzingi, Chalak
    Mumtaz, Mubashir
    Jasper, John B.
    Goswami, Rohan
    Morsy, Mohamed S.
    Ramanathan, Kodangudi B.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 118 (10) : 1466 - 1472
  • [28] Preventive versus Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Meta-Analysis
    Song, Yeo-Jeong
    Shin, Ho-Cheol
    Yang, Joo-Ii
    Lee, Ho-Young
    Jin, Han-Young
    Seo, Jeong-Sook
    Yang, Tae-Hyun
    Kim, Dae-Kyeong
    Kim, Dong-Soo
    Jang, Jae-Sik
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 28 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [29] Comparative Effectiveness of Complete Revascularization Strategies in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
    Zhao, Lingyue
    Guo, Wenqin
    Huang, Weichao
    Wang, Lili
    Mo, Fanrui
    Chen, Xiehui
    Li, Chaoyang
    Huang, Siquan
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [30] Meta-Analysis of Multivessel Coronary Artery Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Kumar, Sunil
    Poddar, Kanhaiya L.
    Ramasamy, Sureshkumar
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Faxon, David P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 107 (09) : 1300 - 1310