Place-based reproductive justice and resistance: Human rights and abortion mobilities in the Post-Dobbs era

被引:1
作者
Mills, Elizabeth [1 ]
Delaet, Debra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Dept Social Anthropol, Brighton BN1 9RH, England
[2] Drake Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Des Moines, IA USA
关键词
abortion mobilities; abortion rights; care; human rights; racial justice; reproductive justice; resistance; STRUCTURAL RACISM; INJUSTICE; ACTIVISM; HEALTH; BORDER; WOMEN; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1002/fea2.12152
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This article integrates human rights and abortion mobilities frameworks to demonstrate the ramifications of abortion restrictions and highlights historic and emergent forms reproductive justice and resistance. It engages with and critiques narrow conceptualizations of reproductive rights and biopolitics and considers the complex ways that abortion legislation becomes embodied in the post-Dobbs era. Mobility is explored across three frames-repression, privilege, and resistance-to highlight the interconnections between reproductive (in)justice and place-based resistance. Situating the analysis within human rights scholarship and reproductive justice and mobilities scholarship, the article outlines the continuities and current configurations of place-based reproductive (in)justice across three interconnected axes. The first axis traces the embodied ramifications of anti-abortion laws for marginalized individuals and communities; the second axis explores the complex personal, political, and economic costs of travelling to access abortion care; and the third axis reflects on historic and current forms of community-based resistance and care. Read together, these axes challenge binary assumptions of agency or subjugation and instead reveal how embodied experiences of abortion restrictions for marginalized individuals and groups also run alongside radical forms of community care to resist these restrictions and address broader forms of lived intersectional inequalities.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 269
页数:24
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Human Rights Watch
[2]  
Bissonnette A., 2020, BORDERS BORDER WALLS, P151
[3]   Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of black Americans [J].
Bleich, Sara N. ;
Findling, Mary G. ;
Casey, Logan S. ;
Blendon, Robert J. ;
Benson, John M. ;
SteelFisher, Gillian K. ;
Sayde, Justin M. ;
Miller, Carolyn .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 54 :1399-1408
[4]   Restricted access to abortion in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: exploring abortion tourism and barriers to legal reform [J].
Bloomer, Fiona ;
O'Dowd, Kellie .
CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY, 2014, 16 (04) :366-380
[5]   The access paradox: Abortion law, policy and practice in Ethiopia, Tanzania and Zambia [J].
Blystad A. ;
Haukanes H. ;
Tadele G. ;
Haaland M.E.S. ;
Sambaiga R. ;
Zulu J.M. ;
Moland K.M. .
International Journal for Equity in Health, 18 (1)
[6]  
Bridges K. M., 2020, MICH LAW REV, V119, P1187
[7]   The Dysgenic State: Environmental Injustice and Disability-Selective Abortion Bans [J].
Bridges, Khiara M. .
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2022, 110 (02) :297-369
[8]  
Bridges KM, 2011, REPRODUCING RACE: AN ETHNOGRAPHY OF PREGNANCY AS A SITE OF RACIALIZATION, P1
[9]   Black Women's Lived Experiences of Abortion [J].
Brown, Katherine ;
Plummer, Melissa ;
Bell, Arielle ;
Combs, Maya ;
Gates-Burgess, Brandi ;
Mitchell, Alexandra ;
Sparks, Marshawna ;
McLemore, Monica R. ;
Jackson, Andrea .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (07) :1099-1113
[10]  
Brown Wendy., 2020, States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity