Estimating abundance of a recovering transboundary brown bear population with capture-recapture models

被引:4
作者
Vanpe, Cecile [1 ]
Piedallu, Blaise [2 ]
Quenette, Pierre-Yves [1 ]
Sentilles, Jerome [1 ]
Queney, Guillaume [3 ]
Palazon, Santiago [4 ]
Jordana, Ivan Afonso [5 ]
Jato, Ramon [6 ]
Irurtia, Miguel Mari Elosegui [7 ]
de la Torre, Jordi Sola [8 ]
Gimenez, Olivier [2 ]
机构
[1] Direct Rech & Appui Sci DRAS, Off Francais Biodivers OFB, Villeneuve De Riviere, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut CEFE, CNRS, EPHE,IRD, Montpellier, France
[3] ANTAGENE, La Tour De Salvagny, France
[4] Fauna & Flora Serv, Dept Terr & Sustainabil, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Med Ambient Conselh Generau Aran, Vielha, Spain
[6] SLU Huesca, Soc Aragonesa Gest Agroambiental, Dept Prod & Asistencias Tecn, Huesca, Spain
[7] Gobierno Navarra Nafarroako Gobernua Pamplona-Irun, Serv Biodivers, Secc Espacios Nat & Especies Amenazadas, Pamplona, Spain
[8] Dept Med Ambient Andorra Vella, Unitat Fauna, Andorra La Vella, Andorra
来源
PEER COMMUNITY JOURNAL | 2022年 / 2卷
关键词
HOME-RANGE; TEMPORARY EMIGRATION; SIZE ESTIMATION; ROBUST-DESIGN; URSUS-ARCTOS; MARK; WILDLIFE; DNA; RECOMMENDATIONS; CARNIVORES;
D O I
10.24072/pci.ecology.100103
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Estimating the size of small populations of large mammals can be achieved via censuses, or complete counts, of recognizable individuals detected over a time period: minimum detected (population) size (MDS). However, as a population grows larger and its spatial distribution expands, the risk of underestimating population size using MDS rapidly increases because the assumption of perfect detection of all individuals in the population is violated. The need to report uncertainty around population size estimates consequently becomes crucial. We explored these biases using the monitoring framework of the critically endangered Pyrenean brown bear that was close to extinction in the mid-1990s, with only five individuals remaining, but was subsequently bolstered by the introduction of 11 bears from Slovenia. Each year since 1996, the abundance of the population has been assessed using MDS and minimum retained (population) size (MRS), which corresponded to a reassessment of the MDS in the light of the new information collected in subsequent years (e.g., adding bears which were not detected the previous years but detected the current year). We used Pollock's closed robust design (PCRD) capture-recapture models applied to the cross-border non-invasive sampling data from France, Spain and Andorra to provide the first published annual abundance and temporal trend estimates of the Pyrenean brown bear population since 2008. Annual population size increased fivefold between 2008 and 2020, going from 13 to 66 individuals. PCRD estimates were globally close to MRS counts and had reasonably narrow associated 95% Credibility Intervals. Even in cases where sampling effort is large compared to population size, the PCRD estimates of population size can diverge from the MDS counts. We report individual heterogeneity in detection that might stem from intraspecific home range size variation that result in individuals that move the most being most likely to be detected. We also found that cubs had a higher mortality rate than adults and subadults, because of infanticide by males, predation, maternal death, or abandonment. Overall, the PCRD capture-recapture modelling approach provides estimates of abundance and demographic rates of the Pyrenean brown bear population, together with associated uncertainty, while minimizing bias due to inter-individual heterogeneity in detection probabilities. We strongly encourage wildlife ecologists and vital for informing management decision-making and assessing population conservation status.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, MODEL SELECTION INFE, DOI DOI 10.1007/B97636
[2]   Evaluating Methods for Counting Cryptic Carnivores [J].
Balme, Guy A. ;
Hunter, Luke T. B. ;
Slotow, Rob .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 73 (03) :433-441
[3]  
Bassi C., 2021, Rapport de stage de Master 2e annee
[4]  
Beaumelle C., 2016, Rapport de stage de Master 1ere annee
[5]   Estimating population size of elusive animals with DNA from hunter-collected feces: Four methods for brown bears [J].
Bellemain, E ;
Swenson, JE ;
Tallmon, O ;
Brunberg, S ;
Taberlet, P .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (01) :150-161
[6]   Effectiveness of different types of hair traps for brown bear research and monitoring [J].
Berezowska-Cnota, Teresa ;
Luque-Marquez, Ignacio ;
Elguero-Claramunt, Isabel ;
Bojarska, Katarzyna ;
Okarma, Henryk ;
Selva, Nuria .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10)
[7]   Wildlife in a Politically Divided World: Insularism Inflates Estimates of Brown Bear Abundance [J].
Bischof, Richard ;
Broseth, Henrik ;
Gimenez, Olivier .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2016, 9 (02) :122-130
[8]   Abundance of rare and elusive species: Empirical investigation of closed versus spatially explicit capture-recapture models with lynx as a case study [J].
Blanc, Laetitia ;
Marboutin, Eric ;
Gatti, Sylvain ;
Gimenez, Olivier .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 77 (02) :372-378
[9]   Spatial Capture-Recapture Models [J].
Borchers, David ;
Fewster, Rachel .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (02) :219-232
[10]  
Boulanger J, 2002, URSUS, V13, P137