AI-generated recommendations: Roles of language style, perceived AI human-likeness, and recommendation agent

被引:0
|
作者
Baek, Tae Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Hyoje Jay [2 ]
Kim, Jungkeun [3 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Media & Commun, Seoul 03063, South Korea
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Strathclyde Business Sch, Dept Mkt, 199 Cathedral St, Glasgow G4 0QU, Scotland
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Hospitality, Hotel Management & Tourism, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
关键词
Figurative language; Generative AI; ChatGPT; Travel destination recommendations; AI human-likeness; Recommendation agent; FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE; METAPHOR; IMPACT; COMMUNION; RESPONSES; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104106
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research investigated the impact of linguistic styles on the acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated recommendations, using three experiments. Specifically, we considered the use of figurative versus literal language in ChatGPT. The findings of Study 1 indicated that figurative language positively affects visit intention, with imagery vividness serving as a mediator in the underlying process. Study 2 revealed that the effect of figurative language on ChatGPT recommendations was stronger for those who perceived the AI as human-like. Conversely, Study 3 showed that while the figurative language used by ChatGPT significantly boosted visit intention compared with literal language, this enhancement was less pronounced when recommendations were made by a human agent.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AI-generated vs human-authored texts: A multidimensional comparison
    Sardinha, Tony Berber
    APPLIED CORPUS LINGUISTICS, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [32] Entropy and complexity analysis of AI-generated and human-made paintings
    Papia, E. -M.
    Kondi, A.
    Constantoudis, V.
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2023, 170
  • [33] Classification of human- and AI-generated texts for different languages and domains
    Kristina Schaaff
    Tim Schlippe
    Lorenz Mindner
    International Journal of Speech Technology, 2024, 27 (4) : 935 - 956
  • [34] An Applied Statistics dataset for human vs AI-generated answer classification
    Salim, Md. Shahidul
    Hossain, Sk Imran
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2024, 54
  • [35] Consumers' Emotional Responses to AI-Generated Versus Human-Generated Content: The Role of Perceived Agency, Affect and Gaze in Health Marketing
    Diwanji, Vaibhav Shwetangbhai
    Geana, Mugur
    Pei, Jun
    Nguyen, Nhung
    Izhar, Nazra
    Chaif, Rim H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2025,
  • [36] CAN LARGE-LANGUAGE MODELS ACCURATELY DISCERN AI-GENERATED SEXUAL MEDICINE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE FROM HUMAN GENERATED?
    Singh, D.
    Greenberg, J. W.
    Shkolnik, B.
    Hellstrom, W.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [37] SEEING IT IN THE FLESCH: COMPARING READABILITY BETWEEN AI-GENERATED AND HUMAN-WRITTEN PLAIN-LANGUAGE ABSTRACTS
    McMinn, D.
    Valena, T.
    Bender, W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S11 - S11
  • [38] Survey on AI-Generated Plagiarism Detection: The Impact of Large Language Models on Academic Integrity
    Pudasaini, Shushanta
    Miralles-Pechuan, Luis
    Lillis, David
    Llorens Salvador, Marisa
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2024,
  • [39] Human vs. Machine: A Comparative Study on the Detection of AI-Generated Content
    Tadjine, Amal bou
    Harrag, Fouzi
    Shaalan, Khaled
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ASIAN AND LOW-RESOURCE LANGUAGE INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2025, 24 (02)
  • [40] Scoring AI-generated policy recommendations with Risk-Adjusted Gain in Net Present Happiness
    Joseph Breeden
    AI and Ethics, 2024, 4 (4): : 1201 - 1211