HIL Test Verification of PDPI Control of Induction Generator-Based Multi-Rotor Wind Turbine Systems

被引:1
作者
Benbouhenni, Habib [1 ]
Yessef, Mourad [2 ]
Bizon, Nicu [3 ,4 ]
Kadi, Sara [5 ]
Alhejji, Ayman [6 ]
Bossoufi, Badre [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Polytech Sch Oran Maurice Audin, Dept Elect Engn, LAAS Lab, Oran El Mnaouer, Algeria
[2] SMBA Univ Fez, Fac Sci Dhar El Mahraz, Lab EMSA, Fes, Morocco
[3] Natl Univ Sci & Technol POLITEHN Bucharest, Pitesti Univ Ctr, Fac Elect Commun & Comp, Pitesti, Romania
[4] Natl Res & Dev Inst Cryogen & Isotop Technol, ICSI Energy, Ramnicu Valcea, Romania
[5] Univ Sci & Technol Houari Boumediene, Dept Elect Engn, PECD Lab, Bab Ezzouar, Algeria
[6] Yanbu Ind City, Elect Engn Dept, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia
关键词
direct power command; induction generator; multi-rotor wind turbine; proportional-derivative proportional-integral regulator; rotor side converter; ENERGY-CONVERSION SYSTEM; FIELD-ORIENTED CONTROL; SLIDING MODE CONTROL; POWER-CONTROL; CONTROL STRATEGIES; DFIG; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; VALIDATION; PI;
D O I
10.1002/ese3.1976
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this experimental study, a new technique is designed and presented for controlling the rotor side converter of an induction generator (IG) for multi-rotor wind turbine (MRWT) systems. The direct power command (DPC) strategy is used to regulate the reactive and active power (Qs and Ps). DPC is characterized by several drawbacks, the most prominent of which are low durability, low current/power quality, and the use of power estimation. Therefore, a new PDPI (proportional-derivative proportional-integral) regulator is used as a suitable solution to overcome these shortcomings while maintaining simplicity, achieving a rapid dynamic response, and obtaining gains that characterize the DPC. The suggested DPC for controlling the IG inverter of an MRWT system uses two PDPI regulators and pulse width modulation (PWM) to create and generate the pulses necessary to run and regulate the IG inverter. First, the DPC-PDPI-PWM is verified in a MATLAB using different tests, and the characteristics of the DPC-PDPI-PWM is compared to that of DPC under different working conditions for a 1500 kW IG. Second, the validity of the simulated results is verified using the Hardware-in-the loop (HIL) test for the DPC-PDPI-PWM, and dSPACE 1104 is used for this purpose. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the DPC-PDPI-PWM approach over DPC, as the harmonic distortion of the stream is minimized by 36.66%, 22.68%, and 33.33% in the three proposed tests. Also, the overshoot value of Ps was reduced compared to DPC by ratios estimated at 70.96%, 71.42%, and 70.31% in all tests. DPC-PDPI-PWM also reduces the steady-state error of Qs compared to DPC by 68.33%, 58.82%, 67.90% in all tests performed. The experimental results confirm the numerical results, suggesting that the DPC-PDPI-PWM is a suitable solution in the field of command in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 159
页数:20
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   FPGA in the Loop Implementation for Observer Sliding Mode Control of DFIG-Generators for Wind Turbines [J].
Alami, Houda El ;
Bossoufi, Badre ;
Motahhir, Saad ;
Alkhammash, Eman H. ;
Masud, Mehedi ;
Karim, Mohammed ;
Taoussi, Mohammed ;
Bouderbala, Manale ;
Lamnadi, Mouna ;
El Mahfoud, Mohammed .
ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (01)
[2]  
Almakki ANJ., 2023, ECTI Trans. Electr. Eng. Electron. Commun, V21, P2, DOI [10.37936/ecti-eec.2023212.249817, DOI 10.37936/ECTI-EEC.2023212.249817]
[3]  
Amrane F, 2016, REV ROUM SCI TECH-EL, V61, P319
[4]  
Antony ASM, 2024, INT J RENEW ENERGY R, V14, P166
[5]  
Ardjal Aghiles, 2018, 2018 5th International Conference on Renewable Energy: Generation and Applications (ICREGA), P94, DOI 10.1109/ICREGA.2018.8337639
[6]   Direct torque control improvement of a variable speed DFIG based on a fuzzy inference system [J].
Ayrir, W. ;
Ourahou, M. ;
El Hassouni, B. ;
Haddi, A. .
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2020, 167 :308-324
[7]   Active and Passive Control of a Dual Rotor Wind Turbine Generator for DC Grids [J].
Beik, Omid ;
Al-Adsani, Ahmad S. .
IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 :1987-1995
[8]  
Bekakra Y, 2012, INT J RENEW ENERGY R, V2, P471
[9]  
Benbouhenni H., 2019, CARPATHIAN J ELECT C, V12, P1, DOI DOI 10.2478/CJECE-2019-0009
[10]  
Benbouhenni H., 2019, Int. J. Smart Grid-ijSmartGrid, V3, P216, DOI [10.20508/ijsmartgrid.v3i4.86.g74, DOI 10.20508/IJSMARTGRID.V3I4.86.G74]