Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Benchmarking Uptake for a Regional Improvement Programme

被引:1
作者
Taylor, John C. [1 ,3 ]
Burke, Dermot
Iversen, Lene H. [2 ]
Birch, Rebecca J. [1 ,3 ]
Finan, Paul J. [1 ,3 ]
Iles, Mark M. [3 ,4 ]
Quirke, Philip
Morris, Eva J. A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Med Res St Jamess, Leeds, England
[2] Danish Colorectal Canc Grp, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Data Analyt, Worsley Bldg, Leeds LS2 9NL, England
[4] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, NIHR Leeds Biomed Res Ctr, Leeds, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Big Data Inst, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Oxford, England
关键词
Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery; Population-based; Denmark; England; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; TRAINING-PROGRAM; HEALTH-CARE; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; MULTICENTER; MORTALITY; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2024.05.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The uptake of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with colorectal cancer has progressed at differing rates, both across countries, and within countries. This study aimed to investigate uptake for a regional colorectal cancer improvement programme in England.Method: We calculated the proportion of patients receiving elective laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery amongst those diagnosed with colorectal cancer over 3 time periods (2007-2011, 2012-2016 and 2017-2021) in hospitals participating in the Yorkshire Cancer Research Bowel Cancer Improvement Programme (YCR BCIP). These were benchmarked against national rates. Regression analysis and funnel plots were used to develop a data driven approach for analysing trends in the use of MIS at hospitals in the programme.Results: In England, resections performed by MIS increased from 34.9% to 72.9% for colon cancer and from 28.8% to 72.5% for rectal cancer. Robot-assisted surgery increased from 0.1% to 2.7% for colon cancer and from 0.2% to 7.9% for rectal cancer. Wide variation in the uptake of MIS was observed at a hospital level. Detailed analysis of the YCR BCIP region identified a decreasing number of surgical departments, since the start of the programme, as potential outliers for MIS when compared to the English national average.Conclusion: Wide variation in use of MIS for colorectal cancer exists within the English National Health Service and a data-driven approach can help identify outlying hospitals. Addressing some of the challenges behind the uptake of MIS, such as ensuring adequate provision of surgical training and equipment, could help increase its use.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 391.e1
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, NATL I HLTH CARE EXC
  • [2] Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe Implementation and Outcomes
    Babaei, Masoud
    Balavarca, Yesilda
    Jansen, Lina
    Gondos, Adam
    Lemmens, Valery
    Sjovall, Annika
    Johannesen, Tom Borge
    Moreau, Michel
    Gabriel, Liberale
    Goncalves, Ana Filipa
    Bento, Maria Jose
    van de Velde, Tony
    Kempfer, Lana Raffaela
    Becker, Nikolaus
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Ulrich, Cornelia M.
    Schrotz-King, Petra
    Brenner, Hermann
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (22)
  • [3] Barber RM, 2017, LANCET, V390, P231, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30818-8, 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30818-8]
  • [4] The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England: a new training paradigm
    Coleman, M. G.
    Hanna, G. B.
    Kennedy, R.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (06) : 614 - 616
  • [5] Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Annual Report 2016
  • [6] Data Resource Profile: The COloRECTal cancer data repository (CORECT-R)
    Downing, Amy
    Hall, Peter
    Birch, Rebecca
    Lemmon, Elizabeth
    Affleck, Paul
    Rossington, Hannah
    Boldison, Emily
    Ewart, Paul
    Morris, Eva J. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (05) : 1418 - +
  • [7] Laparoscopic Surgery and the debate on its safety during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of recommendations
    El Boghdady, Michael
    Ewalds-Kvist, Beatrice Marianne
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2021, 19 (02): : E29 - E39
  • [8] Expert consensus on a train-the-trainer curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery
    Gomez Ruiz, M.
    Alfieri, S.
    Becker, T.
    Bergmann, M.
    Boggi, U.
    Collins, J.
    Figueiredo, N.
    Gogenur, I.
    Matzel, K.
    Miskovic, D.
    Parvaiz, A.
    Pratschke, J.
    Rivera Castellano, J.
    Qureshi, T.
    Svendsen, L. B.
    Tekkis, P.
    Vaz, C.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (08) : 903 - 908
  • [9] The influence of NICE guidance on the uptake of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Green, Chris J.
    Maxwell, Roy
    Verne, Julia
    Martin, Richard M.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 31 (04) : 541 - 545
  • [10] Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Guillou, PJ
    Quirke, P
    Thorpe, H
    Walker, J
    Jayne, DG
    Smith, AMH
    Heath, RM
    Brown, JM
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) : 1718 - 1726