Reproductive decision-making experiences of Australian adults with neurofibromatosis type 1 and schwannomatosis

被引:0
|
作者
Gonzalez, Tina [1 ]
Mclean, Alison [1 ]
Fleming, Jane [1 ,2 ]
Morris, Katrina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pacque, Melissa [1 ]
Forwood, Caitlin [1 ]
Wong, Claire [1 ]
Siow, Sue-Faye [1 ,2 ]
Barter, Sarah [1 ]
Jones, Kristi J. [4 ,5 ]
Drummond, Katharine [6 ,7 ]
Berman, Yemima [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal North Shore Hosp, Dept Clin Genet, St Leonards, NSW 2064, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth & Med, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Concord, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Childrens Hosp, Kids Neurosci, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[6] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[7] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Surg, Parkville, Vic, Australia
关键词
decision-making; family planning; neurofibromatosis; preconception; schwannomatosis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA; HEALTH; IMPACT; PREVALENCE; ATTITUDES; PARENTS; DECLINE; COUPLES;
D O I
10.1002/jgc4.1997
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 and schwannomatosis (NF) often face difficult reproductive choices when family planning; however, their experiences and the barriers and enablers to reproductive decision-making are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to explore the opinions and experiences of individuals with NF in Australia and inform the development of practice recommendations and resources. Focus groups with adults with NF were conducted using a semi-structured interview schedule developed by the research team. Partners were also invited. The focus groups were recorded, de-identified, transcribed, and analyzed using codebook thematic analysis. Three focus groups were conducted with 17 participants (12 = NF1, 4 = NF2-related schwannomatosis [NF2-SWN] and one partner). Three themes were identified: (1) Barriers and enablers; (2) Contemplating the options; and (3) Education and support needs. Barriers to reproductive decision-making included: difficulty accessing healthcare services to discuss reproductive planning; a lack of access to reliable information sources and support; and, in some cases, the financial cost of assistive reproductive technology. Conversely, positive healthcare experiences and support systems enabled reproductive choices. Participants reported many factors that contributed to their reproductive decisions, including: their personal experience of their condition; concern about their future health and that of an affected child; the impact of pregnancy on their health; and the opinion of healthcare providers, family, and friends. Many participants reported mental health difficulties related to their condition and additional stressors related to the reproductive journey. Participants' recommendations included increased access to healthcare services to discuss reproductive options, the development of comprehensive information resources, and improved psychological and peer support for individuals with NF considering family planning and, where relevant, their partners. In conclusion, people with NF and their partners identify a need for improved awareness of NF among healthcare professionals and increased access to appropriate services, information, and support to facilitate informed reproductive decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Choice of dialysis modality: patients' experiences and quality of decision after shared decision-making
    Finderup, Jeanette
    Lomborg, Kirsten
    Jensen, Jens Dam
    Stacey, Dawn
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [32] Providers' perspectives on the reproductive decision-making of BRCA-positive women
    Dason, E. S.
    Drost, L.
    Greenblatt, E. M.
    Scheer, A. S.
    Han, J.
    Sobel, M.
    Allen, L.
    Jacobson, M.
    Doshi, T.
    Wolff, E.
    McMahon, E.
    Jones, C. A.
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [33] Reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV: A systematic review
    Huertas-Zurriaga, Ariadna
    Palmieri, Patrick A.
    Aguayo-Gonzalez, Mariela P.
    Dominguez-Cancino, Karen A.
    Casanovas-Cuellar, Cristina
    Vander Linden, Kara L.
    Cesario, Sandra K.
    Edwards, Joan E.
    Leyva-Moral, Juan M.
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 18
  • [34] The effects of physical exertion on decision-making performance of Australian football umpires
    Paradis, Kasey
    Larkin, Paul
    O'Connor, Donna
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2016, 34 (16) : 1535 - 1541
  • [35] Reproductive decision-making: a qualitative study among couples at increased risk of having a child with retinoblastoma
    Dommering, C. J.
    van den Heuvel, M. R.
    Acmoll, A. C.
    Imhof, S. M.
    Meijers-Heijboer, H.
    Henneman, L.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2010, 78 (04) : 334 - 341
  • [36] Treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: A qualitative study
    Gong, Ni
    Du, Qianqian
    Lou, Hongyu
    Zhang, Yiheng
    Fang, Hengying
    Zhang, Xueying
    Wu, Xiaoyu
    Meng, Ya
    Zhang, Meifen
    NURSING ETHICS, 2021, 28 (02) : 242 - 252
  • [37] Treatment Decision-Making Involvement in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer
    Pyke-Grimm, Kimberly A.
    Franck, Linda S.
    Kelly, Katherine Patterson
    Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie
    Goldsby, Robert E.
    Kleiman, Ari
    Rehm, Roberta S.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2019, 46 (01) : E22 - E37
  • [38] Who do Australian women seek social support from during the reproductive decision-making process?
    Graham, Melissa
    McKenzie, Hayley
    Haintz, Greer Lamaro
    Dennis, Carly
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2022, 30 (06) : E4028 - E4040
  • [40] Midwives' experiences of facilitating informed decision-making - a narrative literature review
    Kloester, Joy
    Willey, Suzanne
    Hall, Helen
    Brand, Gabrielle
    MIDWIFERY, 2022, 109