Impact assessment study of mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) on social equity through nonwork accessibility in rural Japan

被引:2
作者
Chinbat, Tugsdelger [1 ]
Fumihiko, Nakamura [2 ]
Mihoko, Matsuyuki [3 ]
Shinji, Tanaka [3 ]
Ryo, Ariyoshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama Natl Univ, Grad Sch Urban Innovat, Yokohama 2408501, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Frontier Sci, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
[3] Yokohama Natl Univ, Inst Urban Innovat, Yokohama 2408501, Japan
来源
ASIAN TRANSPORT STUDIES | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
Social equity; Accessibility; Mobility-as-a-service (MaaS); PLANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eastsj.2023.100109
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
People with transportation access can easily join socioeconomic activities. However, insufficient accessibility levels hinder this engagement, causing the inequitable distribution of transportation benefits. Accessibility distribution for nonwork activities has become a serious issue, especially in rural Japan's aging population. Using the National Integrated Transport Analysis System's travel survey data, this study aims to evaluate whether Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) can enhance social equity and accessibility levels, specifically for vulnerable groups in most need of aid in rural Japan. To assess accessibility distribution for nonwork activities, person- and place- based accessibility measures provided detailed observations of individual accessibility levels across social groups. The Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve measured the fairness of transportation benefits distribution for different transportation modes. Transportation was less accessible to the elderly than to young and middle-aged people, and bus accessibility was unequal. Nevertheless, the AI on-demand shuttle caused a remarkable decrease in the accessibility inequity of two out-of-home activities.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Akagi D., 2021, J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. Ser. D3. (Infrastruct. Plan. Manag.), V76, P1197, DOI [10.2208/jscejipm.76.5_I_1197, DOI 10.2208/JSCEJIPM.76.5_I_1197]
  • [2] Akiyama T., 2001, IATSS Res., V25, P42, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60005-4, 10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60005-4]
  • [3] Walkability Index for Elderly Health: A Proposal
    Alves, Fernando
    Cruz, Sara
    Ribeiro, Anabela
    Bastos Silva, Ana
    Martins, Joao
    Cunha, Ines
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, Guidelines Recommendations to Create the Foundations for a Thriving MaaS Ecosystem
  • [5] Sustainable urban mobility plans: Bridging climate change and equity targets?
    Arsenio, Elisabete
    Martens, Karel
    Di Ciommo, Floridea
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2016, 55 : 30 - 39
  • [6] A conceptual framework to formulate transportation network design problem considering social equity criteria
    Behbahani, Hamid
    Nazari, Sobhan
    Kang, Masood Jafari
    Litman, Todd
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 125 : 171 - 183
  • [7] Accessibility measurements in Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil
    Boisjoly, Genevieve
    Serra, Bernardo
    Oliveira, Gabriel T.
    El-Geneidy, Ahmed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 82
  • [8] Burton E., 2006, Inclusive urban design: streets for life, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780080456454
  • [9] Cao MQ, 2019, NECTAR SER TRANSP, P209
  • [10] Children, Young people and Mobility as a Service: Opportunities and barriers for future mobility
    Casado, Regina Gairal
    Golightly, David
    Laing, Karen
    Palacin, Roberto
    Todd, Liz
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 4