Lecture Recordings, Viewing Habits, and Performance in an Introductory Programming Course

被引:6
|
作者
Picardo, Valerie [1 ]
Denny, Paul [1 ]
Luxton-Reilly, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD AUSTRALASIAN COMPUTING EDUCATION CONFERENCE, ACE 2021 | 2021年
关键词
CS1; binge-watching; lecture recording; video; student behaviour; repeating students; student performance; pedagogy; viewing habits;
D O I
10.1145/3441636.3442307
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Lecture recordings are a common and useful resource for students due to the flexibility they provide. Recent rapid shifts to online modes of teaching have made recorded lectures especially valuable as many students rely on them to access course content. As a result, there is a pressing need to understand how students consume lecture content via recordings and what patterns of access are effective. In this research, we investigate the common lecture recording viewing behaviors of students and the relationship between lecture recording viewing and academic performance in a first-year programming course. Several trends were observed. A significant positive correlation between lecture recording views and final grades was identified. Students who repeated the course after failing it once, achieved, on average, higher grades if they had more lecture recording views in their second attempt. A small number of students engaged in habitual "binge-watching" behavior and those students had lower grades, on average, than students who watched more regularly. This was a particular problem for repeating students, attempting the course a second time, who failed the course at twice the rate if they engaged in habitual binge-watching. Although lecture recordings appear to be a helpful learning resource for students in introductory programming courses, this work suggests that binge-watching is an unproductive study strategy that should be discouraged.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 79
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reducing the dropout rate in an introductory programming course
    Yadin A.
    ACM Inroads, 2011, 2 (04) : 71 - 76
  • [32] Promoting Algorithmic Thinking in an Introductory Programming Course
    Malik, Sohail Iqbal
    Shakir, Mohanaad
    Eldow, Abdalla
    Ashfaque, Mohammed Waseem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2019, 14 (01) : 84 - 94
  • [33] A Self-Paced Introductory Programming Course
    Gill, T.
    Holton, Carolyn
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION-RESEARCH, 2006, 5 : 95 - 105
  • [34] Motivation and Engagement with PBL in an Introductory Programming Course
    Souza, Suenny M.
    Bittencourt, Roberto A.
    2019 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2019), 2019,
  • [35] PREDICTING STUDENT SUCCESS IN AN INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING COURSE
    MAZLACK, LJ
    COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1978, 21 (04): : 380 - 381
  • [36] The effectiveness of games as assignments in an introductory programming course
    Cliburn, Daniel C.
    36TH ANNUAL FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, CONFERENCE PROGRAM, VOLS 1-4: BORDERS: INTERNATIONAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL, 2006, : 354 - 358
  • [37] Closing the gender gap in an introductory programming course
    Angel Rubio, Miguel
    Romero-Zaliz, Rocio
    Manoso, Carolina
    de Madrid, Angel P.
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 82 : 409 - 420
  • [38] Introductory programming course: review and future implications
    Omer, Uzma
    Farooq, Muhammad Shoaib
    Abid, Adnan
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, 7
  • [39] SDIm An Introductory Programming Course with an ECE Context
    Gonzalez, Virgilio
    Freudenthal, Eric
    2010 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2010,
  • [40] Introductory programming course: review and future implications
    Omer U.
    Farooq M.S.
    Abid A.
    PeerJ Computer Science, 2021, 7 : 1 - 33