Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Thai version of the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Social Support Inventory in individuals with chronic illnesses

被引:0
作者
Phetrnui, Santi [1 ,2 ]
Suwanno, Jom [1 ,2 ]
Chiaranai, Chantira [3 ]
Bunsuk, Chonchanok [1 ,2 ]
Koson, Naruebeth [4 ]
Kumanjan, Wanna [1 ,2 ]
Phonphet, Chennet [1 ,3 ]
Thiamwong, Ladda [5 ]
机构
[1] Walailak Univ, Sch Nursing, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
[2] Walailak Univ, Excellent Ctr Community Hlth Promot, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
[3] Suranaree Univ Technol, Inst Nursing, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
[4] Praboromarajchanok Inst, Boromarajonani Coll Nursing Nakhon Si Thammarat, Fac Nursing, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
[5] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Nursing, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
Chronic illness; Reliability; Self-care; Social support; Validity; SELF-CARE; FIT INDEXES; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.12.013
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to translate and psychometrically test the 7-item Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) Social Support Inventory (ESSI) scale within the Thai population. Methods: A scale translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated for Thai involved nine steps: preparation, forward translation, reconciliation, backtranslation, back-translation review, harmonization, cognitive debriefing, review of cognitive debriefing and finalization, and proofreading. Psychometrics testing used data from a cross-sectional study from July to November 2022 at 16 primary care centers in southern Thailand, involving 405 participants. Structural validity was tested with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA). Hypothesis testing validity was assessed through correlations with the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale version 3.0 (SCSES-v3.0) and the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4.c (SC-CII-v4.c). Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's a coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: The Thai ESSI demonstrated excellent content validity. EFA revealed a one-factor structure, with high factor loadings for the first six items assessing informational, emotional, and instrumental support. The last item on structural support demonstrated inadequate factor loadings, suggesting its removal. CFA confirmed a well-fit one-factor structure for the 6-item ESSI. Hypothesis testing showed positive correlations with the SCSES-v3.0 and SC-CII-v4.c scales. Cronbach's a coefficient improved from 0.88 for the 7-item to 0.91 for the 6-item ESSI. Both the 7-item and the 6-item scales exhibited excellent test-retest reliability. Conclusions: Our study affirms the strong validity and reliability of the ESSI in the Thai population with chronic illnesses. The ESSI is deemed appropriate for evaluating social support in the context of chronic illness self-care. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Chinese Nursing Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity
    Almanasreh, Enas
    Moles, Rebekah
    Chen, Timothy F.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2019, 15 (02) : 214 - 221
  • [2] Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures
    Anthoine E.
    Moret L.
    Regnault A.
    Sbille V.
    Hardouin J.-B.
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12 (1)
  • [3] Generalizability of the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory Across Cultures and Languages: Italy and the United States
    Ausili, Davide
    Barbaranelli, Claudio
    Riegel, Barbara
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2020, 43 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [4] Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models
    Bagozzi, Richard P.
    Yi, Youjae
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01) : 8 - 34
  • [5] The Problem With Cronbach's Alpha Comment on Sijtsma and van der Ark (2015)
    Barbaranelli, Claudio
    Lee, Christopher S.
    Vellone, Ercole
    Riegel, Barbara
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 64 (02) : 140 - 145
  • [6] Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness
    Beckerman, H
    Roebroeck, ME
    Lankhorst, GJ
    Becher, JG
    Bezemer, PD
    Verbeek, ALM
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) : 571 - 578
  • [7] Berkman L, 2001, PSYCHOSOM MED, V63, P747
  • [8] The Modifying Effects of Social Support on Psychological Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure
    Blumenthal, James A.
    Zhu, Yidan
    Koch, Gary G.
    Smith, Patrick J.
    Watkins, Lana L.
    Hinderliter, Alan, I
    Hoffman, Benson M.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    Chang, Patricia P.
    O'Connor, Christopher
    Johnson, Kristy S.
    Sherwood, Andrew
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 38 (06) : 502 - 508
  • [9] Brown JD, 1999, Standard error vs. standard error of measurement Internet
  • [10] Browne M., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005