Immunobiologics in juvenile dermatomyositis: a systematic review of promising therapeutic advances

被引:0
作者
Rocha, Aline Maria de Oliveira [1 ]
Ribeiro, Gabriel Fidelis [2 ]
Silva, Juliana Capecce [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Pediat, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ Sao Camilo, S?o Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
REUMATOLOGIA | 2024年 / 62卷 / 06期
关键词
juvenile dermatomyositis; pharmaceutical; immunobiologics; pediatric rheumatology; INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN; REFRACTORY ADULT; CALCINOSIS; RITUXIMAB; POLYMYOSITIS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.5114/reum/195799
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: To identify the most effective treatment for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), considering efficacy, safety, impact on patients and improvement in their quality of life. Material and methods: A systematic review was carried out comparing known treatments and immunobiological therapies, evaluating clinical improvement, adverse events and prognosis. The MEDLINE, PubMed, LILACS and Cochrane Library databases were used with children aged 0 to 18 diagnosed with JDM. The PRISMA 2020 statement was followed throughout the process. Results: The immunobiologics studied were rituximab (RTX) and anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs and used the Disease Activity Score to skin, Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale and Manual Muscle Testing tools. There was no difference in the response when RTX was used (early or late). The anti-TNF studies were carried out in a population that was refractory to the initial treatment and showed a significant improvement in muscle and skin disease activity. Conclusions: For severe or refractory disease, biologics tend to be the medication with the best therapeutic response.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 455
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Lundberg IE, Tjarnlund A, Bottai M, Et al., 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies and Their Major Subgroups, Arthritis Rheum, 69, pp. 1955-1964, (2017)
  • [2] Leung AKC, Lam JM, Alobaida S, Et al., Juvenile Dermatomyositis: Advances in Pathogenesis, Assessment, and Management, Curr Pediatr Rev, 17, pp. 273-287, (2021)
  • [3] Pachman LM, Nolan BE, DeRanieri D, Khojah AM., Juvenile dermatomyositis: new clues to diagnosis and therapy, Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol, 7, pp. 39-62, (2021)
  • [4] Hoeltzel MF, Oberle EJ, Robinson AB, Et al., The presentation, assessment, pathogenesis, and treatment of calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis, Curr Rheumatol Rep, 16, (2014)
  • [5] Sallum AM, Pivato FC, Doria-Filho U, Et al., Risk factors associated with calcinosis of juvenile dermatomyositis, J Pediatr (Rio J), 84, pp. 68-74, (2008)
  • [6] Clemente G, Piotto DGP, Barbosa C, Et al., High frequency of calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis: a risk factor study, Rev Bras Reumatol (Press), 52, pp. 545-553, (2012)
  • [7] Valenzuela A, Chung L., Calcinosis: pathophysiology and management, Curr Opin Rheumatol, 27, pp. 542-548, (2015)
  • [8] Higgins JPT, Savovic J, Page MJ, Et al., Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022)
  • [9] Wu JQ, Lu MP, Reed AM., Juvenile dermatomyositis: advances in clinical presentation, myositis-specific antibodies and treatment, World J Pediatr, 16, pp. 31-43, (2020)
  • [10] Bohan A, Peter JB., Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts), N Engl J Med, 292, pp. 344-347, (1975)