Allogenic faecal microbiota transplantation for antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in critically ill patients (FEBATRICE)-Study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial (phase II)

被引:0
|
作者
Cibulkova, Ivana [1 ,2 ]
Rehorova, Veronika [2 ,3 ]
Soukupova, Hana [2 ,4 ]
Waldauf, Petr [2 ,3 ]
Cahova, Monika [5 ]
Manak, Jan [6 ]
Matejovic, Martin [7 ]
Duska, Frantisek [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kralovske Vinohrady Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 3, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Kralovske Vinohrady Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Kralovske Vinohrady Univ Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Dept Expt Med, Prague, Czech Republic
[6] Charles Univ Teaching Hosp Hradec Kralove, Dept Internal Med Metab & Gerontol 3, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
[7] Pilsen Univ Hosp, Fac Med Pilsen, Dept Internal Med 1, Plzen, Czech Republic
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 12期
关键词
CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE INFECTION; INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA; VANCOMYCIN; PROBIOTICS; DECREASES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0310180
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Exposure of critically ill patients to antibiotics lead to intestinal dysbiosis, which often manifests as antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Faecal microbiota transplantation restores gut microbiota and may lead to faster resolution of diarrhoea.Methods Into this prospective, multi-centre, randomized controlled trial we will enrol 36 critically ill patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. We will exclude patients with ongoing sepsis, need of systemic antibiotics, or those after recent bowel surgery or any other reason that prevents the FMT. Randomisation will be in 1:1 ratio. Patients in the control group will receive standard treatment based on oral diosmectite. In the intervention group, patients will receive, in addition to the standard of care, faecal microbiota transplantation via rectal tube, in the form of a preparation mixed from 7 thawed aliquots (50 mL) made from fresh stool of 7 healthy unrelated donors and quarantined deep frozen for 3 to 12 months. Primary outcome is treatment failure defined as intervention not delivered or diarrhoea persisting at day 7 after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include safety measures such as systemic inflammatory response, adverse events, and also diarrhoea recurrence within 28 days. Exploratory outcomes focus on gut barrier function and composition of intestinal microbiota.Discussion Faecal microbiota transplantation has been effective for dysbiosis in non-critically ill patients with recurrent C. difficile infections and it is plausible to hypothesize that it will be equally effective for symptoms of dysbiosis in the critically ill patients. In addition, animal experiments and observational data suggest other benefits such as reduced colonization with multi-drug resistant bacteria and improved gut barrier and immune function. The frozen faeces from unrelated donors are immediately available when needed, unlike those from the relatives, who require lengthy investigation. Using multiple donors maximises graft microbiota diversity. Nonetheless, in vulnerable critically ill patients, Faecal microbiota transplantation might lead to bacterial translocation and unforeseen complications. From growing number of case series it is clear that its off label use in the critically ill patients is increasing and that there is a burning need to objectively assess its efficacy and safety, which this trial aims.Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05430269).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Evaluation of intensive community care services for young people with psychiatric emergencies: study protocol for a multi-centre parallel-group, single-blinded randomized controlled trial with an internal pilot phase
    Thaventhiran, Thilipan
    Wong, Ben Hoi-Ching
    Pilecka, Izabela
    Masood, Saba
    Atanda, Opeyemi
    Clacey, Joe
    Tolmac, Jovanka
    Wehncke, Leon
    Romaniuk, Liana
    Heslin, Margaret
    Tassie, Emma
    Chu, Petrina
    Bevan-Jones, Rhys
    Woolhouse, Ruth
    Mahdi, Tauseef
    Dobler, Veronika Beatrice
    Wait, Mandy
    Reavey, Paula
    Landau, Sabine
    Byford, Sarah
    Zundel, Toby
    Ougrin, Dennis
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [22] Digital peer-to-peer support programme for informal caregivers of people living with motor neuron disease: study protocol for a multi-centre parallel group, single-blinded (outcome assessor) randomised controlled superiority trial
    Rose, Louise
    Thaventhiran, Thilipan
    Hobson, Esther
    Rogers, Rebecca
    James, Kirsty
    Chu, Petrina
    Carter, Ben
    Faull, Christina
    Saha, Sian
    Lee, Jeong Su
    Kaltsakas, Georgios
    McDermott, Christopher
    Ramsay, Michelle
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [23] Benefits of Aldosterone Receptor Antagonism in Chronic Kidney Disease (BARACK D) trial-a multi-centre, prospective, randomised, open, blinded end-point, 36-month study of 2,616 patients within primary care with stage 3b chronic kidney disease to compare the efficacy of spironolactone 25 mg once daily in addition to routine care on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes versus routine care alone: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Hill, Nathan R.
    Lasserson, Daniel
    Thompson, Ben
    Perera-Salazar, Rafael
    Wolstenholme, Jane
    Bower, Peter
    Blakeman, Thomas
    Fitzmaurice, David
    Little, Paul
    Feder, Gene
    Qureshi, Nadeem
    Taal, Maarten
    Townend, Jonathan
    Ferro, Charles
    McManus, Richard
    Hobbs, F. D. Richard
    TRIALS, 2014, 15 (01)
  • [24] Benefits of Aldosterone Receptor Antagonism in Chronic Kidney Disease (BARACK D) trial-a multi-centre, prospective, randomised, open, blinded end-point, 36-month study of 2,616 patients within primary care with stage 3b chronic kidney disease to compare the efficacy of spironolactone 25 mg once daily in addition to routine care on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes versus routine care alone: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Hill, Nathan R.
    Lasserson, Daniel
    Thompson, Ben
    Perera-Salazar, Rafael
    Wolstenholme, Jane
    Bower, Peter
    Blakeman, Thomas
    Fitzmaurice, David
    Little, Paul
    Feder, Gene
    Qureshi, Nadeem
    Taal, Maarten
    Townend, Jonathan
    Ferro, Charles
    McManus, Richard
    Hobbs, F. D. Richard
    TRIALS, 2014, 15