Indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Pimentel, Tulio [1 ]
Queiroz, Ivo [2 ]
Ruelas, Mariano Gallo [3 ]
de Mesquita, Cynthia Florencio [1 ]
Defante, Maria L. R. [4 ]
Roy, Mayank [5 ]
Loftus, Tyler J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Dept Med, Av Prof Moraes Rego,1235 Cidade Univ, BR-50670901 Recife, PE, Brazil
[2] Univ Catolica Pernambuco, Dept Med, Recife, Brazil
[3] Inst Invest Nutr, Dept Nutr, Lima, Peru
[4] Redentor Univ Ctr, Dept Med, Itaperuna, Brazil
[5] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Gen Surg, Weston, FL USA
[6] Univ Florida Hlth, Dept Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2025.109149
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography is a noninvasive, real-time visualization method to prevent misinterpretation of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses exclusively on randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of this technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to August 2024. The main endpoints of interest included bile duct injuries and identification success rates of biliary structures. A trial sequential analysis was performed to establish implications for further research. Results: Eight studies comprising 1,586 patients were included. The results showed no statistically significant differences in bile duct injuries (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-10.80; I2 1/4 32%), identification success rates of the cystic duct (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-3.86; I2 1/4 32%) or common hepatic duct (odds ratio, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-8.15; I2 1/4 82%). However, a significant difference was observed in the success rate odds for identifying the common bile duct (odds ratio, 4.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-9.41; I2 1/4 64%). The trial sequential analysis provided certainty that the improved success rate for identifying the common bile duct is not a result of type 1 error, but further studies are necessary to assess the results of most outcomes. Conclusion: Indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography significantly improved the odds of success in identifying the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, additional randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its effects on identifying other biliary structures and affecting patient outcomes. (c) 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography and intraoperative angiography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Abd-erRazik, Mohammad A.
    Elghandour, Abdelrahman M.
    Osman, Ahmed
    Hamid, Mohamed A. S. Abdel
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 41 (01): : 153 - 160
  • [2] Comparison of indocyanine green dye fluorescent cholangiography with intra-operative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
    Lim, Sioh Huang
    Tan, Hui Ting Alyssa
    Shelat, Vishal G.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (04): : 1511 - 1520
  • [3] Comparison of indocyanine green dye fluorescent cholangiography with intra-operative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
    Sioh Huang Lim
    Hui Ting Alyssa Tan
    Vishal G. Shelat
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 1511 - 1520
  • [4] Laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Imsirovic, Anja
    Nyame, Sandra A.
    Miles, William F. A.
    Sains, Parv
    Singh, Krishna K.
    Sajid, Muhammad S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 73 - 73
  • [5] Intraoperative Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hall, Catherine
    Amatya, Slesha
    Shanmugasundaram, Ramesh
    Lau, Ngee-Soon
    Beenen, Edwin
    Gananadha, Sivakumar
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [6] Umbilical port versus epigastric port for gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
    Kulkarni, Aditya A.
    Sharma, Gopal
    Deo, Kunal Bikram
    Jain, Tanvi
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2022, 20 (03): : E26 - E35
  • [7] Efficacy and Safety of Near-Infrared Florescence Cholangiography Using Indocyanine Green in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lie, Hendry
    Irawan, Andry
    Sudirman, Taufik
    Budiono, Bernardus Parish
    Prabowo, Erik
    Jeo, Wifanto Saditya
    Rudiman, Reno
    Sitepu, Ryanto Karobuana
    Hanafi, Ricarhdo Valentino
    Hariyanto, Timotius Ivan
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (05): : 434 - 446
  • [8] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Muhammad S. Sajid
    Nikhil Ladwa
    Lorain Kalra
    Kristian K. Hutson
    Krishna K. Singh
    Mazin Sayegh
    World Journal of Surgery, 2012, 36 : 2644 - 2653
  • [9] Single-access Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Classic Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zehetner, Joerg
    Pelipad, Diana
    Darehzereshki, Ali
    Mason, Rodney J.
    Lipham, John C.
    Katkhouda, Namir
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (03): : 235 - 243
  • [10] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sajid, Muhammad S.
    Ladwa, Nikhil
    Kalra, Lorain
    Hutson, Kristian K.
    Singh, Krishna K.
    Sayegh, Mazin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (11) : 2644 - 2653