Artificial intelligence to revolutionize IBD clinical trials: a comprehensive review

被引:0
作者
Sedano, Rocio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Solitano, Virginia [2 ,4 ]
Vuyyuru, Sudheer K. [1 ]
Yuan, Yuhong [1 ,3 ]
Hanzel, Jurij [5 ]
Ma, Christopher [6 ,7 ]
Nardone, Olga Maria [8 ]
Jairath, Vipul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
[3] Lawson Hlth Res Inst, Room A10-219 Univ Hosp 339 Windermere Rd, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
[4] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Div Gastroenterol & Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Ljubljana, Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Dept Gastroenterol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[6] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Federico II Naples, Dept Publ Hlth, Naples, Italy
关键词
artificial intelligence (AI); clinical trials; inflammatory bowel disease; machine learning (ML); patient recruitment; ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; MULTI-OMICS; THERAPY; UNDERREPRESENTATION; RELIABILITY; VEDOLIZUMAB; INTEGRATION; MINORITIES; CHALLENGES; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1177/17562848251321915
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical trials for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has potential to be transformative to the field. This article explores how AI-driven technologies, including machine learning (ML), natural language processing, and predictive analytics, have the potential to enhance important aspects of IBD trials-from patient recruitment and trial design to data analysis and personalized treatment strategies. As AI advances, it has potential to improve long-standing challenges in trial efficiency, accuracy, and personalization with the goal of accelerating the discovery of novel therapies and improve outcomes for people living with IBD. AI can streamline multiple trial phases, from target identification and patient recruitment to data analysis and monitoring. By integrating multi-omics data, electronic health records, and imaging repositories, AI can uncover molecular targets and personalize trial strategies, ultimately expediting drug development. However, the adoption of AI in IBD clinical trials encounters significant challenges. These include technical barriers in data integration, ethical concerns regarding patient privacy, and regulatory issues related to AI validation standards. Additionally, AI models risk producing biased outcomes if training datasets lack diversity, potentially impacting underrepresented populations in clinical trials. Addressing these limitations requires standardized data formats, interdisciplinary collaboration, and robust ethical frameworks to ensure inclusivity and accuracy. Continued partnerships among clinicians, researchers, data scientists, and regulators will be essential to establish transparent, patient-centered AI frameworks. By overcoming these obstacles, AI has the potential to enhance the efficiency, equity, and efficacy of IBD clinical trials, ultimately benefiting patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 136 条
[31]  
Khanna R., Ma C., Hogan M., Et al., Standardizing scoring conventions for Crohn’s disease endoscopy: an international RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Study, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 21, (2023)
[32]  
Reinisch W., Mishkin D.S., Oh Y.S., Et al., Impact of various central endoscopy reading models on treatment outcome in Crohn’s disease using data from the randomized, controlled, exploratory cohort arm of the BERGAMOT trial, Gastrointest Endosc, 93, (2021)
[33]  
Jairath V., Zou G.Y., Ma C., Et al., Routine incorporation of the local read in Crohn’s disease clinical trials? Not so fast, Gastrointest Endosc, 93, pp. 183-186, (2021)
[34]  
Schroeder K.W., Tremaine W.J., Ilstrup D.M., Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A randomized study, N Engl J Med, 317, pp. 1625-1629, (1987)
[35]  
Travis S.P., Schnell D., Krzeski P., Et al., Reliability and initial validation of the ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity, Gastroenterology, 145, pp. 987-995, (2013)
[36]  
Rimondi A., Gottlieb K., Despott E.J., Et al., Can artificial intelligence replace endoscopists when assessing mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis? A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis, Dig Liver Dis, 56, pp. 1164-1172, (2024)
[37]  
Feagan B.G., Rutgeerts P., Sands B.E., Et al., Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis, N Engl J Med, 369, pp. 699-710, (2013)
[38]  
Collaborators C.-I., Ma C., Hanzel J., Et al., CORE-IBD: A multidisciplinary international consensus initiative to develop a core outcome set for randomized controlled trials in inflammatory bowel disease, Gastroenterology, 163, pp. 950-964, (2022)
[39]  
Yao H., Najarian K., Gryak J., Et al., Fully automated endoscopic disease activity assessment in ulcerative colitis, Gastrointest Endosc, 93, (2021)
[40]  
Lo B., Liu Z., Bendtsen F., Et al., High accuracy in classifying endoscopic severity in ulcerative colitis using convolutional neural network, Am J Gastroenterol, 117, pp. 1648-1654, (2022)