Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine with ketofol and ketofol alone on quality of sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial

被引:0
作者
Chakravarty, Reena [1 ]
Goyal, Neha [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [1 ]
Mohammed, Sadik [1 ]
Kamal, Manoj [1 ]
Chhabra, Swati [1 ]
Bhatia, Pradeep [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Conscious sedation; dexmedetomidine; ketofol; magnetic resonance imaging; sedation; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; PROPOFOL; CHILDREN; KETAMINE; COMBINATION; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.4103/sja.sja_327_24
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Patient movement during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most frequent cause of artifacts and poor scan quality. Children cannot lie still. Thus, anesthesia is required to keep the child calm and immobile. This randomized double-blinded clinical trial compares the clinical effects of the addition of dexmedetomidine as premedication with ketofol on the quality of sedation. We hypothesized that the addition of dexmedetomidine would improve the quality of sedation. Methods: A total of 132 children aged 6 months to 10 years were randomized into groups DK (dexmedetomidine-ketofol) and K (ketofol). DK received an intravenous bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) as premedication 10 minutes prior. Both the groups were induced with ketofol (0.5 mg/kg), and sedation was maintained with propfol infusion (100 mcg/kg/min). The primary objective was the quality of sedation as assessed by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. Image quality, requirement of rescue propofol dose, recovery, and adverse events were also studied. Data are given as median [interquartile range (IQR)] or frequency. Results: All 132 children completed MRI scans. The DK group showed significantly better quality of sedation, 71% versus 47% of children, a median difference of 1 (-0.569 to -0.0969), P < .005, a better quality of scan, a reduced number of additional doses of propofol, and a decreased total dose of propofol. Hemodynamic parameters and recovery times for the two groups were similar. There were no significant side effects in both groups. Conclusion: The quality of sedation and the quality of the MRI scan are greatly improved by administering dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) 10 minutes before to induction. Additionally, this technique decreases the need of propofol and gives better hemodynamic stability without delaying the recovery time.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Prakhar Gyanesh ;
Rudrashish Haldar ;
Divya Srivastava ;
Prashant Mohan Agrawal ;
Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari ;
P. K. Singh .
Journal of Anesthesia, 2014, 28 :12-18
[42]   Efficacy of oral ketamine compared to midazolam for sedation of children undergoing laceration repair: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial [J].
Rubinstein, Orit ;
Barkan, Shiri ;
Breitbart, Rachelle ;
Berkovitch, Sofia ;
Toledano, Michal ;
Weiser, Giora ;
Karadi, Natali ;
Nassi, Anat ;
Kozer, Eran .
MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (26)
[43]   Comparison of bolus dose administration of propofol and dexmedetomidine for incidence of emergence delirium in pediatric patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia: A randomized, double-blind trial [J].
Tharu, Vidya ;
Paliwal, Naveen ;
Bihani, Pooja ;
Janweja, Sarita ;
Jaju, Rishabh ;
Kothari, Sunil .
JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 40 (04) :693-698
[44]   Comparison Between Esketamine and Alfentanil for Hysteroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Weng, Mengcao ;
Wang, Dongdong ;
Zhong, Jia ;
Qian, Minyue ;
Zhang, Kai ;
Jin, Yue .
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2024, 18 :3629-3641
[45]   A randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing three sedation regimens during flexible bronchoscopy: Dexmedetomidine, alfentanil and lidocaine [J].
Riachy, Moussa ;
Khayat, Georges ;
Ibrahim, Ihab ;
Aoun, Zeina ;
Dabar, Georges ;
Bazarbachi, Taha ;
Khalil, Nadine ;
Habr, Bassem .
CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (04) :1407-1415
[46]   A double-blind randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone and in combination with ketamine in uncooperative and anxious paediatric dental patients requiring pulpectomy [J].
Haider, K. ;
Mittal, N. ;
Srivastava, B. ;
Gupta, N. .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 23 (03) :465-473
[47]   Comparison of oral midazolam with intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication for children undergoing CT imaging: a randomized, double-blind, and controlled study [J].
Ghai, Babita ;
Jain, Kajal ;
Saxena, Akshay Kumar ;
Bhatia, Nidhi ;
Sodhi, Kushaljit Singh .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 27 (01) :37-44
[48]   Investigation of the effects of propofol/ketamine versus propofol/fentanyl on nausea-vomiting administered for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective randomized double-blinded study [J].
Gurcan, Haci Semih ;
Ulgey, Ayse ;
Oz Gergin, Ozlem ;
Seckin Pehlivan, Sibel ;
Yildiz, Karamehmet .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 51 (04) :2120-2126
[49]   The effects of subtenon and intravenous dexmedetomidine on patients undergoing cataract surgery: A comparative randomized controlled double-blind study [J].
Saad, Ashraf Magdy Eskandr ;
Abd-Allah Elmorsy, Osama ;
Abd-Elmaseeh Sadik, Sadik .
JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 39 (03) :360-365
[50]   A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine, Esketamine or a Dexmedetomidine-Esketamine Combination for Induction of Anaesthesia in Children: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial [J].
Lu, Xinlei ;
Tang, Ling ;
Lan, Haiyan ;
Li, Chunli ;
Lin, Han .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 12