Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine with ketofol and ketofol alone on quality of sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial

被引:0
作者
Chakravarty, Reena [1 ]
Goyal, Neha [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [1 ]
Mohammed, Sadik [1 ]
Kamal, Manoj [1 ]
Chhabra, Swati [1 ]
Bhatia, Pradeep [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Conscious sedation; dexmedetomidine; ketofol; magnetic resonance imaging; sedation; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; PROPOFOL; CHILDREN; KETAMINE; COMBINATION; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.4103/sja.sja_327_24
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Patient movement during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most frequent cause of artifacts and poor scan quality. Children cannot lie still. Thus, anesthesia is required to keep the child calm and immobile. This randomized double-blinded clinical trial compares the clinical effects of the addition of dexmedetomidine as premedication with ketofol on the quality of sedation. We hypothesized that the addition of dexmedetomidine would improve the quality of sedation. Methods: A total of 132 children aged 6 months to 10 years were randomized into groups DK (dexmedetomidine-ketofol) and K (ketofol). DK received an intravenous bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) as premedication 10 minutes prior. Both the groups were induced with ketofol (0.5 mg/kg), and sedation was maintained with propfol infusion (100 mcg/kg/min). The primary objective was the quality of sedation as assessed by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. Image quality, requirement of rescue propofol dose, recovery, and adverse events were also studied. Data are given as median [interquartile range (IQR)] or frequency. Results: All 132 children completed MRI scans. The DK group showed significantly better quality of sedation, 71% versus 47% of children, a median difference of 1 (-0.569 to -0.0969), P < .005, a better quality of scan, a reduced number of additional doses of propofol, and a decreased total dose of propofol. Hemodynamic parameters and recovery times for the two groups were similar. There were no significant side effects in both groups. Conclusion: The quality of sedation and the quality of the MRI scan are greatly improved by administering dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) 10 minutes before to induction. Additionally, this technique decreases the need of propofol and gives better hemodynamic stability without delaying the recovery time.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine to oral midazolam as premedication for propofol sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: the MIDEX MRI trial [J].
Wabelo, Olivia Nzungu ;
Schmartz, Denis ;
Giancursio, Mario ;
De Pooter, Francoise ;
Caruso, Giulia ;
Fils, Jean-Francois ;
Van der Linden, Philippe .
TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
[22]   Ketamine-Propofol Combination (Ketofol) Versus Propofol Alone for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial [J].
Andolfatto, Gary ;
Abu-Laban, Riyad B. ;
Zed, Peter J. ;
Staniforth, Sean M. ;
Stackhouse, Sherry ;
Moadebi, Susanne ;
Willman, Elaine .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 59 (06) :504-512
[23]   Propofol or Ketofol for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Emergency Medicine-The POKER Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial [J].
Ferguson, Ian ;
Bell, Anthony ;
Treston, Greg ;
New, Lisa ;
Ding, Mingshuang ;
Holdgate, Anna .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 68 (05) :574-582
[24]   Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Ketofol versus Combination of Ketofol and Lidocaine for Short-Term Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients; Double Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Effects on Recovery [J].
Biliskov, Ana Nevescanin ;
Gulam, Danijela ;
Zaja, Marija ;
Pogorelic, Zenon .
CHILDREN-BASEL, 2022, 9 (02)
[25]   Pediatric premedication: a double-blind randomized trial of dexmedetomidine or ketamine alone versus a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine [J].
Qiao, Hui ;
Xie, Zhi ;
Jia, Jie .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17
[26]   Comparison of effects of propofol and ketamine–propofol mixture (ketofol) on laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions and hemodynamics in elderly patients: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial [J].
Mehmet Ali Erdogan ;
Zekine Begec ;
Mustafa Said Aydogan ;
Ulku Ozgul ;
Aytac Yucel ;
Cemil Colak ;
Mahmut Durmus .
Journal of Anesthesia, 2013, 27 :12-17
[27]   Comparison of dexmedetomidine with propofol as sedatives for pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis [J].
Tang, Yong ;
Meng, Juan ;
Zhang, Xinxian ;
Li, Jiong ;
Zhou, Qiang .
EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (03) :1775-1785
[28]   A retrospective comparison of propofol to dexmedetomidine for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging sedation in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II [J].
Kang, RyungA ;
Shin, Young Hee ;
Gil, Nam-Su ;
Oh, Ye Na ;
Hahm, Tae Soo ;
Jeong, Ji Seon .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2018, 28 (12) :1116-1122
[29]   A randomized, double-blind, dose-controlled study of the use of dexmedetomidine alone for procedural sedation of children and adolescents undergoing MRI scans [J].
Khan, Umar ;
Hammer, Gregory B. ;
Duncan-Azadi, Cassandra ;
Suzuki, Yasuyuki ;
Chiles, Deborah ;
Chime, Sunring ;
Chappell, Phillip .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2024, 34 (05) :405-414
[30]   Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Gyanesh, Prakhar ;
Haldar, Rudrashish ;
Srivastava, Divya ;
Agrawal, Prashant Mohan ;
Tiwari, Akhilesh Kumar ;
Singh, P. K. .
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2014, 28 (01) :12-18