Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine with ketofol and ketofol alone on quality of sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial

被引:0
作者
Chakravarty, Reena [1 ]
Goyal, Neha [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [1 ]
Mohammed, Sadik [1 ]
Kamal, Manoj [1 ]
Chhabra, Swati [1 ]
Bhatia, Pradeep [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Conscious sedation; dexmedetomidine; ketofol; magnetic resonance imaging; sedation; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; PROPOFOL; CHILDREN; KETAMINE; COMBINATION; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.4103/sja.sja_327_24
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Patient movement during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most frequent cause of artifacts and poor scan quality. Children cannot lie still. Thus, anesthesia is required to keep the child calm and immobile. This randomized double-blinded clinical trial compares the clinical effects of the addition of dexmedetomidine as premedication with ketofol on the quality of sedation. We hypothesized that the addition of dexmedetomidine would improve the quality of sedation. Methods: A total of 132 children aged 6 months to 10 years were randomized into groups DK (dexmedetomidine-ketofol) and K (ketofol). DK received an intravenous bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) as premedication 10 minutes prior. Both the groups were induced with ketofol (0.5 mg/kg), and sedation was maintained with propfol infusion (100 mcg/kg/min). The primary objective was the quality of sedation as assessed by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. Image quality, requirement of rescue propofol dose, recovery, and adverse events were also studied. Data are given as median [interquartile range (IQR)] or frequency. Results: All 132 children completed MRI scans. The DK group showed significantly better quality of sedation, 71% versus 47% of children, a median difference of 1 (-0.569 to -0.0969), P < .005, a better quality of scan, a reduced number of additional doses of propofol, and a decreased total dose of propofol. Hemodynamic parameters and recovery times for the two groups were similar. There were no significant side effects in both groups. Conclusion: The quality of sedation and the quality of the MRI scan are greatly improved by administering dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) 10 minutes before to induction. Additionally, this technique decreases the need of propofol and gives better hemodynamic stability without delaying the recovery time.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Dexmedetomidine/propofol versus dexmedetomidine/ketamine versus dexmedetomidine as a sole agent for pediatric sedation during MRI [J].
Abdellatif, Mostafa K. ;
Ibrahim, Tamer H. .
AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 11 (1)
[2]   Propofol and propofol-ketamine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization [J].
Akin, A ;
Esmaoglu, A ;
Guler, G ;
Demircioglu, R ;
Narin, N ;
Boyaci, A .
PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) :553-557
[3]   Addition of ketamine to propofol for initiation of procedural anesthesia in children reduces propofol consumption and preserves hemodynamic stability [J].
Aouad, M. T. ;
Moussa, A. R. ;
Dagher, C. M. ;
Muwakkit, S. A. ;
Jabbour-Khoury, S. I. ;
Zbeidy, R. A. ;
Abboud, M. R. ;
Kanazi, G. E. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 52 (04) :561-565
[4]   A retrospective comparison of propofol alone to propofol in combination with dexmedetomidine for pediatric 3T MRI sedation [J].
Boriosi, Juan P. ;
Eickhoff, Jens C. ;
Klein, Kristi B. ;
Hollman, Gregory A. .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 27 (01) :52-59
[5]   Comparison of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-fentanyl-ketamine combination in pediatric patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures [J].
Erden, I. Aydin ;
Pamuk, A. Gulsun ;
Akinci, Seda B. ;
Koseoglu, Ayhan ;
Aypar, Ulku .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2009, 19 (05) :500-506
[6]  
Hasan Rashed A, 2003, Pediatr Crit Care Med, V4, P454, DOI 10.1097/01.PCC.0000090013.66899.33
[7]  
Kamal K, 2017, SAUDI J ANAESTH, V11, P163, DOI 10.4103/1658-354X.203014
[8]   Sedative, haemodynamic and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examination: preliminary results [J].
Koroglu, A ;
Demirbilek, S ;
Teksan, H ;
Sagir, O ;
But, AK ;
Ersoy, MO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 94 (06) :821-824
[9]   Procedural sedation and analgesia in children [J].
Krauss, B ;
Green, SM .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9512) :766-780
[10]   Sedation of children for magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Lawson, GR .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2000, 82 (02) :150-152