Single-use synthetic plastic and natural fibre anaesthetic drug trays: a comparative life cycle assessment of environmental impacts

被引:4
作者
Lightfoot, Stephen J. [1 ]
Grant, Tim [2 ]
Boyden, Anna [2 ]
McAlister, Scott [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] St George Private Hosp, Dept Anaesthet, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Lifecycles, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Crit Care, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Populat Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
climate change; life-cycle assessment; recycling; single-use medical equipment; sustainable healthcare; CARBON FOOTPRINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.031
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Single-use anaesthetic drug trays are used widely in Australia, but their environmental impact is unclear. Methods: A life cycle assessment was completed for 10 different types of single-use anaesthetic drug trays made of four materials: the synthetic plastics polypropylene and polystyrene, and the natural fibres bagasse (sugarcane pulp) and cellulose pulp. Results: Carbon emissions per tray from total life cycle with landfill disposal were 33-454 g CO2-eq, which equates to 152-2066 tonnes CO2-eq annually. Recycling mitigates this impact, reducing emissions per tray to 16-294 g CO2-eq. The tray with the least emissions for landfill and recycling was the small polystyrene injection tray. There was a significant linear relationship between the mass of a tray and its carbon emissions. For landfill, recycling, and incineration disposal, Pearson's r value was 0.98, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. Composting natural fibres can give a carbon benefit over some synthetic plastics under specific disposal scenarios, but this benefit was not seen under all circumstances. There was a strong positive correlation between the increasing mass of a tray and its increasing environmental impacts for water consumption, particulate matter formation, and mineral depletion. Conclusions: Single-use trays with the lowest mass should be preferentially chosen. Recycling and composting will reduce environmental impacts. Natural fibre does not automatically confer any environmental benefit over plastic and sustainability claims should be carefully examined for accuracy. The practice of using a single-use drug tray for every procedure should be reconsidered.
引用
收藏
页码:1465 / 1477
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of artificial fly ash aggregates and natural aggregate production in India [J].
Shahane, Hrishikesh A. ;
Patel, Satyajit .
INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2024, 9 (03)
[42]   Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of artificial fly ash aggregates and natural aggregate production in India [J].
Hrishikesh A. Shahane ;
Satyajit Patel .
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2024, 9
[43]   Energy Production from Natural Gas: Evaluation of Potential Environmental Impacts using Life Cycle Assessment Approach [J].
Hafizan, C. ;
Noor, Z. Z. ;
Michael, F. L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2014, 864-867 :1132-1138
[44]   Sustainable solutions in single-use food containers: A comprehensive life cycle assessment comparing plastic (PP) and its green alternative (PLA coated kraft paper, PLA) [J].
Peantham, Kasidij ;
Varabuntoonvit, Viganda .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2024, 29 (05)
[45]   A Comparative Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Wood-Aluminum Window Production in Two Life Cycle Assessment Software [J].
Seckar, Michal ;
Schwarz, Marian ;
Pochyba, Adam ;
Polgar, Andras .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (21)
[46]   Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impacts between Dregs Disposal and Conventional Cement Production by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) [J].
Fu, Kan ;
Ren, Xiaoyu ;
Lin, Jinquan ;
Yue, Ping .
ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING (2013), 2013, 777 :461-466
[47]   Comparative life cycle assessment of environmental impacts and economic feasibility of tomato cultivation systems in northern plains of India [J].
Rohit Kumar ;
Arvind Bhardwaj ;
Lakhwinder Pal Singh ;
Gurraj Singh ;
Anupam Kumar ;
Kanhu Charan Pattnayak .
Scientific Reports, 14
[48]   Life-Cycle Assessment of single-use versus reusable surgical drapes (cellulose/polyethylene mixed cotton system) [J].
Dettenkofer, M ;
Griesshammer, R ;
Scherrer, M ;
Daschner, F .
CHIRURG, 1999, 70 (04) :485-491
[49]   Environmental impacts of three waste concrete recycling strategies for prefabricated components through comparative life cycle assessment [J].
Jian, Si-Min ;
Wu, Bo ;
Hu, Nan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 328
[50]   Comparative life cycle assessment of reusable and single use take-away lunch boxes used in student restaurants [J].
Aggarwal, Rahul .
CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 14