Single-use synthetic plastic and natural fibre anaesthetic drug trays: a comparative life cycle assessment of environmental impacts

被引:4
作者
Lightfoot, Stephen J. [1 ]
Grant, Tim [2 ]
Boyden, Anna [2 ]
McAlister, Scott [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] St George Private Hosp, Dept Anaesthet, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Lifecycles, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Crit Care, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Populat Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
climate change; life-cycle assessment; recycling; single-use medical equipment; sustainable healthcare; CARBON FOOTPRINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.031
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Single-use anaesthetic drug trays are used widely in Australia, but their environmental impact is unclear. Methods: A life cycle assessment was completed for 10 different types of single-use anaesthetic drug trays made of four materials: the synthetic plastics polypropylene and polystyrene, and the natural fibres bagasse (sugarcane pulp) and cellulose pulp. Results: Carbon emissions per tray from total life cycle with landfill disposal were 33-454 g CO2-eq, which equates to 152-2066 tonnes CO2-eq annually. Recycling mitigates this impact, reducing emissions per tray to 16-294 g CO2-eq. The tray with the least emissions for landfill and recycling was the small polystyrene injection tray. There was a significant linear relationship between the mass of a tray and its carbon emissions. For landfill, recycling, and incineration disposal, Pearson's r value was 0.98, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. Composting natural fibres can give a carbon benefit over some synthetic plastics under specific disposal scenarios, but this benefit was not seen under all circumstances. There was a strong positive correlation between the increasing mass of a tray and its increasing environmental impacts for water consumption, particulate matter formation, and mineral depletion. Conclusions: Single-use trays with the lowest mass should be preferentially chosen. Recycling and composting will reduce environmental impacts. Natural fibre does not automatically confer any environmental benefit over plastic and sustainability claims should be carefully examined for accuracy. The practice of using a single-use drug tray for every procedure should be reconsidered.
引用
收藏
页码:1465 / 1477
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Life cycle assessment of the co-combustion system of single-use plastic waste and lignite coal to promote circular economy [J].
Joshi, Viraj V. ;
Swaminathan, Ganapathiraman ;
Prabhakaran, S. P. Sathiya .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 329
[22]   A Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Single-Use Central Venous Catheter Insertion Kits [J].
McGain, Forbes ;
McAlister, Scott ;
McGavin, Andrew ;
Story, David .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 114 (05) :1073-1080
[23]   Environmental and financial impacts of perioperative paracetamol use: a multicentre international life-cycle assessment [J].
Davies, Jessica F. ;
McAlister, Scott ;
Eckelman, Matthew J. ;
McGain, Forbes ;
Seglenieks, Richard ;
Gutman, Elena N. ;
Groome, Jonathan ;
Palipane, Natasha ;
Latoff, Katherine ;
Nielsen, Dominic ;
Sherman, Jodi D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 133 (06) :1439-1448
[24]   Cellulose nanofibre films as a substitute for plastic packaging: A comparative environmental life cycle assessment [J].
Nadeem, Humayun ;
Nimmegeers, Philippe ;
Batchelor, Warren ;
Billen, Pieter .
FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING, 2024, 145 :175-186
[25]   Recycling treatment of carbon fibre/epoxy composites: Materials recovery and characterization and environmental impacts through life cycle assessment [J].
La Rosa, A. D. ;
Banatao, D. R. ;
Pastine, S. J. ;
Latteri, A. ;
Cicala, G. .
COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2016, 104 :17-25
[26]   Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Plastic Cosmetic Packaging: A Multi-Attribute Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Vassallo, Nicole ;
Refalo, Paul .
COSMETICS, 2024, 11 (02)
[27]   A comparative life cycle assessment based evaluation of greenhouse gas emission and social study: natural fibre versus glass fibre reinforced plastic automotive parts [J].
Akhshik, Masoud ;
Panthapulakkal, Suhara ;
Tjong, Jimi ;
Sain, Mohini .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2018, 15 (03) :350-369
[28]   Parametric life cycle assessment modeling of reusable and single-use restaurant food container systems [J].
Hitt, Christian ;
Douglas, Jacob ;
Keoleian, Gregory .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 190
[29]   Comparative life cycle assessment of environmental impacts and economic feasibility of tomato cultivation systems in northern plains of India [J].
Kumar, Rohit ;
Bhardwaj, Arvind ;
Singh, Lakhwinder Pal ;
Singh, Gurraj ;
Kumar, Anupam ;
Pattnayak, Kanhu Charan .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
[30]   Use of life cycle assessment to evaluate environmental impacts associated with the management of sludge and biogas [J].
do Amaral, Karina Cubas ;
Aisse, Miguel Mansur ;
Collere Possetti, Gustavo Rafael ;
Prado, Marcelo Real .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 77 (09) :2292-2300