Challenges and barriers for the adoption of personalized medicine in Europe: the case of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test

被引:0
作者
Horgan, Denis [1 ,2 ]
Hofman, Paul [3 ]
Giacomini, Patrizio [4 ]
Dube, France [5 ]
Singh, Jaya [1 ]
Schneider, Daniel [6 ]
Hills, Tanya [7 ]
Faikish, Jennifer [8 ]
van den Bulcke, Marc [9 ]
Malapelle, Umberto [10 ]
Gajewski, Maciej [11 ]
Subbiah, Vivek [12 ]
机构
[1] European Alliance Personalised Med, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Sam Higginbottom Univ Agr Technol & Sci, Jacob Inst Biotechnol & Bioengn, Fac Engn & Technol, Dept Mol & Cellular Engn, Prayagraj, India
[3] Cote Azur Univ, Louis Pasteur Hosp, Lab Clin & Expt Pathol, FHU OncoAge,IHU RespirERA, Nice, France
[4] IRCCS Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst, Clin Trial Ctr, Biostat & Bioinformat, I-00144 Rome, Italy
[5] Astra Zeneca, Waltham, MA USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[7] Boehringer Ingelheim Int GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany
[8] Amgen Inc, 20 Manilla Ave, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[9] Sciensano, Belgian Canc Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
[10] Univ Federico II Naples, Dept Publ Hlth, Naples, Italy
[11] Exact Sci, Baar, Switzerland
[12] Sarah Cannon Res Inst, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
personalized medicine; Oncotype DX; cancer care; clinical integration; reimbursement mechanisms; GENE-EXPRESSION; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; PREDICTION; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1515/dx-2024-0127
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Personalized medicine, aiming to tailor treatments based on individual patient characteristics, holds immense potential in oncology. However, its widespread adoption in Europe faces numerous challenges, as illustrated by the case study of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score (R) assay, a genomic test for breast cancer. This manuscript delineates the multifaceted obstacles encountered during the introduction of the Oncotype DX (R) test (Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test) in Europe from 2004 to 2018. In June 2018, the TAILORx results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:111-21, Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Ravdin PM, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, et al. Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2395-405, and reported that among 6,711 women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and a midrange recurrence score of 11-25 on the Oncotype DX assay, endocrine therapy was not inferior to chemoendocrine therapy, which provides evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy was not beneficial in these patients. Through a comprehensive analysis of clinical evidence, commercial presence, reimbursement mechanisms, guideline recommendations, regulatory pathways, and local experiences, this study sheds light on the intricate dynamics influencing the adoption of personalized medicine technologies. This article examines the various obstacles encountered during the introduction of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay in Europe from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing clinical evidence, commercial presence, reimbursement mechanisms, guideline recommendations, regulatory pathways, and local experiences, this study reveals the complex factors that influence the adoption of personalized medicine technologies. By highlighting these challenges, this article offers valuable insights into strategies to facilitate the integration of innovative diagnostic tools into clinical practice across Europe, ultimately leading to improved treatment decision-making for cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011
    Goldhirsch, A.
    Wood, W. C.
    Coates, A. S.
    Gelber, R. D.
    Thuerlimann, B.
    Senn, H. -J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (08) : 1736 - 1747
  • [12] A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients
    Habel, Laurel A.
    Shak, Steven
    Jacobs, Marlena K.
    Capra, Angela
    Alexander, Claire
    Pho, Mylan
    Baker, Joffre
    Walker, Michael
    Watson, Drew
    Hackett, James
    T Blick, Noelle
    Greenberg, Deborah
    Fehrenbacher, Louis
    Langholz, Bryan
    Quesenberry, Charles P.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (03)
  • [13] American society of clinical oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer
    Harris, Lyndsay
    Fritsche, Herbert
    Mennel, Robert
    Norton, Larry
    Ravdin, Peter
    Taube, Sheila
    Somerfield, Mark R.
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    Bast, Robert C., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (33) : 5287 - 5312
  • [14] From theory to practice: Implementing next-generation sequencing and public health genomics in healthcare systems
    Horgan, Denis
    Pesapane, Filippo
    van der Buckle, Marc
    de Maria, Ruggero
    Dube, France
    Singh, Jaya
    Lugowska, Iwona
    Bayle, Arnaud
    Hofman, Paul
    Malapelle, Umberto
    Hills, Tanya
    Capoluongo, Ettore D.
    Subbiah, Vivek
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 201
  • [15] Clouds across the new dawn for clinical, diagnostic and biological data: accelerating the development, delivery and uptake of personalized medicine
    Horgan, Denis
    Capoluongo, Ettore
    Dube, France
    Trapani, Dario
    Malapelle, Umberto
    Rovite, Vita
    Omar, Muhammad Imran
    Alix-Panabieres, Catherine
    Rutkowski, Piotr
    Bayle, Arnaud
    Hackshaw, Allan
    Hofman, Paul
    Subbiah, Vivek
    [J]. DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 10 (04) : 356 - 362
  • [16] The HOXB13:IL7BR expression index is a prognostic factor in early-stage breast cancer
    Ma, Xiao-Jun
    Hilsenbeck, Susan G.
    Wang, Wilson
    Ding, Li
    Sgroi, Dennis C.
    Bender, Richard A.
    Osborne, C. Kent
    Allred, D. Craig
    Erlander, Mark G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (28) : 4611 - 4619
  • [17] Randomized, phase II trial comparing continuous versus intermittent capecitabine (X) monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Results from the GEICAM 2009-05 study.
    Martin, M.
    Martinez, N.
    Ramos, M.
    Calvo, L.
    Lluch, A.
    Zamora, P.
    Munoz-Mateu, M.
    Caronia, D.
    Carrasco, E. M.
    Garcia Saenz, J. A.
    Casado, A.
    Chacon, I.
    Hernando, B.
    Ruiz-Borrego, M.
    Gonzalez-Neira, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [18] The impact of Oncotype DX testing on breast cancer management and chemotherapy prescribing patterns in a tertiary referral centre
    McVeigh, Terri Patricia
    Hughes, Lauren M.
    Miller, Nicola
    Sheehan, Margaret
    Keane, Maccon
    Sweeney, Karl J.
    Kerin, Michael J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (16) : 2763 - 2770
  • [19] NCCN, 2024, NCCN guidelines online
  • [20] Paik S., 2005, J Clin Orthod, V23, P510, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.23.16suppl.510, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.23.16SUPPL.510]