The political economy of income inequality: Exploring the impact of associational and organizational rights

被引:1
作者
Uzar, Umut [1 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkiye
关键词
Income inequality; associational and organizational freedoms; the political economy of inequality; OECD countries; RIGHT-TO-WORK; CIVIL-SOCIETY; MARKET INSTITUTIONS; POWER RESOURCES; REDISTRIBUTION; UNIONS; GLOBALIZATION; DETERMINANTS; RISE;
D O I
10.1080/03623319.2024.2439476
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The literature on income inequality, which has traditionally focused on economic factors, broadened over the past few years to include political phenomena. The inadequacy of economic factors alone in explaining inequalities has led researchers to examine political drivers. This emerging research line highlights prominent political factors and can significantly enhance academic and political understanding of inequality. This study places specific importance on associational and organizational rights (AOR), which have not been previously studied but are expected to have significant potential effects on income distribution. Accordingly, the work's primary aim is to examine the impact of AOR on income inequality in 35 OECD countries from 2006 to 2021. Moreover, the study focuses on the critical economic factors of economic growth, unemployment, government expenditure, and trade openness. The study's findings indicate that AOR -specifically union and civil society freedoms- can reduce income inequality, thus presenting policymakers with a win-win opportunity. While unemployment emerges as a significant force exacerbating inequality from an economic perspective, government expenditure and trade openness act as mitigating factors against inequality. However, the study does not find a significant effect on economic growth.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D., 2015, Handbook of income distribution, V2, P1885, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-59429-7.00022-4
[2]  
Acemoglu D., 2019, The narrow corridor: How nations struggle for liberty
[3]   TASKS, AUTOMATION, AND THE RISE IN US WAGE INEQUALITY [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Restrepo, Pascual .
ECONOMETRICA, 2022, 90 (05) :1973-2016
[4]   Globalization and the great U-turn: Income inequality trends in 16 OECD countries [J].
Alderson, AS ;
Nielsen, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2002, 107 (05) :1244-1299
[5]   The impact of trade unions and government party orientation on income inequality: evidence from 17 OECD economies [J].
Alexiou, Constantinos ;
Trachanas, Emmanouil .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2023, 50 (03) :506-524
[6]   Financialization, non-financial corporations and income inequality: the case of France [J].
Alvarez, Ignacio .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 13 (03) :449-475
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Freedom in the World 2023: Marking 50 Years in the Struggle for Democracy
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Government at a Glance 2023, DOI DOI 10.1787/3D5C5D31-EN
[9]   Income inequality in the knowledge economy [J].
Antonelli, Cristiano ;
Tubiana, Matteo .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2020, 55 :153-164
[10]   Empirical Analysis of the Key Drivers of Income Inequality in West Africa [J].
Anyanwu, John C. ;
Erhijakpor, Andrew E. O. ;
Obi, Emeka .
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-REVUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT, 2016, 28 (01) :18-38