How Do Robotics and Navigation Facilitate Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery? A Case Series and Narrative Review

被引:0
作者
Quiceno, Esteban [1 ,2 ]
Soliman, Mohamed A. R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Khan, Asham [1 ,2 ]
Mullin, Jeffrey P. [1 ,2 ]
Pollina, John [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Jacobs Sch Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Buffalo, NY USA
[2] Buffalo Gen Med Ctr, Kaleida Hlth, Dept Neurosurg, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neurosurg, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive surgery; Navigation; Robotic-assisted spine surgery; Oblique lateral interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT; SINGLE-POSITION SURGERY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; PRONE TRANSPSOAS; ACCURACY; INSERTION; GUIDANCE; DISEASE; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1227/neu.0000000000003352
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Image guidance has transformed minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), allowing for safer procedures without excessive bony exposure and reducing radiation exposure for the surgical team. Robotic platforms have enhanced the benefits of navigation by providing high precision and accuracy. Here we describe a case series to demonstrate the accuracy and low complication rates of real-time image-guided robotic-assisted (RA) MISS at a tertiary referral center. In addition, we performed a narrative review on how robotics and navigation facilitate MISS.METHODS:A retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain data for patients who underwent RA lumbar fusions with real-time navigation for degenerative lumbar pathology between September 1, 2021, and January 1, 2024. The Mazor X Stealth Edition (Medtronic) robotic platform was used. The accuracy of screw placement was determined according to Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates up to 90 days were recorded. Intraoperative variables and length of stay were compared between open and percutaneous groups.RESULTS:A total of 247 patients underwent insertion of 1156 pedicle screws. The mean patient age was 61.1 +/- 11.5 years. The mean total operative time was 195.1 +/- 80.8 minutes. The mean operative time per screw was 4.2 +/- 1.4 minutes, with a mean of 4.6 +/- 1.4 screws per case. The mean fluoroscopy time per screw was 6.4 +/- 6.2 seconds. Eighty-five patients (34.4%) underwent open RA pedicle screw placement, and 162 (65.6%) underwent percutaneous RA pedicle screw placement. No differences in operative time, length of stay, fluoroscopy time, and surgical complications were found between groups. Intraoperatively, 2 patients (0.8%) experienced complications and 4 patients (1.6%) developed complications within 90 days. Screw placement accuracy was perfect in 1126 screws (97.4%) and clinically acceptable in 30 screws (2.6%). These results were consistent with those reported in the literature.CONCLUSION:Robotic platforms have further enhanced navigation benefits by providing high precision and accuracy, with low complication rates.
引用
收藏
页码:S84 / S93
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] First spine surgery utilizing real-time image-guided robotic assistance
    Ahmed, A. Karim
    Zygourakis, Corinna C.
    Kalb, Samuel
    Zhu, Alex M.
    Molina, Camilo A.
    Jiang, Bowen
    Blitz, Ari M.
    Bydon, Ali
    Crawford, Neil R.
    Theodore, Nicholas
    [J]. COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2019, 24 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [2] Alsalmi Sultan, 2021, Asian J Neurosurg, V16, P759, DOI 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_558_20
  • [3] Level-specific comparison of 3D navigated and robotic arm-guided screw placement: an accuracy assessment of 1210 pedicle screws in lumbar surgery
    Asada, Tomoyuki
    Subramanian, Tejas
    Simon, Chad Z.
    Singh, Nishtha
    Hirase, Takashi
    Araghi, Kasra
    Lu, Amy Z.
    Mai, Eric
    Kim, Yeo Eun
    Tuma, Olivia
    Allen, Myles R. J.
    Kim, Eric
    Korsun, Maximilian
    Zhang, Joshua
    Kwas, Cole
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (10) : 1872 - 1880
  • [4] Radiation Exposure of Patient and Operating Room Personnel by Fluoroscopy and Navigation during Spinal Surgery
    Bratschitsch, G.
    Leitner, L.
    Stuecklschweiger, G.
    Guss, H.
    Sadoghi, P.
    Puchwein, P.
    Leithner, A.
    Radl, R.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [5] Retrospective single-surgeon study of prone versus lateral robotic pedicle screw placement: a CT-based assessment of accuracy
    Brown, Nolan J.
    Pennington, Zach
    Kuo, Cathleen C.
    Shahrestani, Shane
    Gold, Justin
    Diaz-Aguilar, Luis D.
    Mehkri, Yusuf
    Singh, Rohin
    Gendreau, Julian
    Pham, Martin H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 39 (04) : 490 - 497
  • [6] The Clinical Impact of Image Guidance and Robotics in Spinal Surgery: A Review of Safety, Accuracy, Efficiency, and Complication Reduction
    Campbell, David H.
    McDonald, Donnell
    Araghi, Kasra
    Araghi, Tala
    Chutkan, Norman
    Araghi, Ali
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 : S10 - S20
  • [7] Chang MZ, 2022, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V25, pE73
  • [8] Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective matched-control analysis for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes
    Chen, Xiuyuan
    Song, Qingxin
    Wang, Kun
    Chen, Zhi
    Han, Yingchao
    Shen, Hongxing
    Li, Quan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (10) : 845 - 856
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted spinal surgery: A single-center retrospective study
    Chumnanvej, Sorayouth
    Ariyaprakai, Krish
    Pillai, Branesh M.
    Suthakorn, Jackrit
    Gurusamy, Sharvesh
    Chumnanvej, Siriluk
    [J]. LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 6 (04): : 147 - 153
  • [10] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Cui, Guan-yu
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Wei, Yi
    Liu, Ya-jun
    He, Da
    Sun, Yu-qing
    Liu, Bo
    Tian, Wei
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 1960 - 1968