Enhancing Estimation Accuracy of Prostate Cancer VMAT Planning: A Knowledge-based Approach Using Multiple Collimator Angles

被引：0
作者：
Kamima, Tatsuya [1 ,2 ]
Ueda, Yoshihiro [3 ]
Fukunaga, Jun-ichi [4 ]
Shimizu, Yumiko [5 ]
Yoshioka, Yasuo [1 ]
Monzen, Hajime [6 ]
机构：
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Radiat Oncol Dept, 3-8-31 Ariake,Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
[2] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Med, Ibaraki, Japan
[3] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[4] Kyushu Univ Hosp, Dept Med Technol, Div Radiol, Fukuoka, Japan
[5] Seirei Hamamatsu Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shizuoka, Japan
[6] Kindai Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Med Phys, Osaka, Japan
来源：
ANTICANCER RESEARCH | 2024年 / 44卷 / 12期
关键词：
RapidPlan; collimator angle; volumetric modulated arc therapy; prostate cancer; VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC; THERAPY; IMRT;
D O I：
10.21873/anticanres.17358
中图分类号：
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号：
100214 ;
摘要：
Background/Aim: This study aimed to determine whether a knowledge-based planning model incorporating treatment plans with multiple collimator angles (Multi-coll. model) provides superior estimation accuracy and plan quality for a range of collimator angles compared with a typical institutional model (Inst. model). Materials and Methods: Five institutions using volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer participated in the study. The Inst. model comprised plans using a fixed collimator angle, whereas the Multi-coll. model registered plans using single arcs and collimator angles of 10 & ring;, 30 & ring;, 50 & ring;, and 70 & ring;. The coefficient of determination and mean squared error were calculated, and the estimation accuracy and dosimetric results for three validation cases at each institution were compared for each model. Dosimetric parameters included volumes receiving at least 20%, 50%, and 90% of the prescription dose (V20, V50, and V90, respectively) at each collimator angle. Results: The Multi-coll. model yielded a higher coefficient of determination and lower mean squared error than the Inst. model, although overfitting of data was a concern at two institutions. The mean absolute errors between estimated and calculated values were 4.03% vs. 2.27% (V50), and 2.07% vs. 1.09% (V90) for the rectum; 3.48% vs. 3.42% (V20), 2.24% vs. 3.65% (V50), and 1.11% vs. 0.73% (V90) for the bladder. The Multi-coll. model exhibited a lower rectal and vesical V 20 than the Inst. model. Conclusion: The Multi-coll. model had a greater estimation accuracy and slightly higher plan quality than the Inst. model.
引用
收藏
页码：5303 / 5312
页数：10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Shen J, Dai Z, Yu J, Yuan Q, Kang K, Chen C, Liu H, Xie C, Wang X, Sub-arc collimator angle optimization based on the conformity index heatmap for VMAT planning of multiple brain metastases SRS treatments, Front Oncol, 12, (2022)
  • [2] Kim H, Li R, Lee R, Xing L, Beam’s-eye-view dosimetrics (BEVD) guided rotational station parameter optimized radiation therapy (SPORT) planning based on reweighted total-variation minimization, Phys Med Biol, 60, 5, pp. N71-N82, (2015)
  • [3] Kim JI, Ahn BS, Choi CH, Park JM, Park SY, Optimal collimator rotation based on the outline of multiple brain targets in VMAT, Radiat Oncol, 13, 1, (2018)
  • [4] Ohira S, Sagawa T, Ueda Y, Inui S, Masaoka A, Akino Y, Mizuno H, Miyazaki M, Koizumi M, Teshima T, Effect of collimator angle on HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery planning for single and multiple brain metastases, Med Dosim, 45, 1, pp. 85-91, (2020)
  • [5] Otto K, Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc, Med Phys, 35, 1, pp. 310-317, (2008)
  • [6] Fogliata A, Clivio A, Nicolini G, Vanetti E, Cozzi L, Intensity modulation with photons for benign intracranial tumours: A planning comparison of volumetric single arc, helical arc and fixed gantry techniques, Radiother Oncol, 89, 3, pp. 254-262, (2008)
  • [7] Treutwein M, Hipp M, Koelbl O, Dobler B, Searching standard parameters for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer, Radiat Oncol, 7, (2012)
  • [8] Zhang P, Happersett L, Yang Y, Yamada Y, Mageras G, Hunt M, Optimization of collimator trajectory in volumetric modulated arc therapy: development and evaluation for paraspinal SBRT, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 77, 2, pp. 591-599, (2010)
  • [9] Bokrantz R, van Amerongen JH, Craft D, Technical Note: Improving VMAT delivery efficiency by optimizing the dynamic collimator trajectory, Med Phys, 46, 9, pp. 3877-3882, (2019)
  • [10] MacDonald RL, Syme A, Little B, Ward L, Thomas CG, Toward the combined optimization of dynamic axes (CODA) for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery using fixed couch trajectories, Med Phys, 47, 2, pp. 307-316, (2020)
123