Useful or merely convenient: can enzymatic antioxidant activity be used as a proxy for abiotic stress tolerance?

During their lifespan, plants are often exposed to a broad range of stresses that change their redox balance and lead to accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The traditional view is that this comes with negative consequences to cells structural integrity and metabolism and, to prevent this, plants evolved a complex and well-coordinated antioxidant defence system that relies on the operation of a range of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants (AO). Due to the simplicity of measuring their activity, and in light of the persistent dogma that stress-induced ROS accumulation is detrimental for plants, it is not surprising that enzymatic AOs have often been advocated as suitable proxies for stress tolerance as well as potential targets for improving tolerance traits. However, there are a growing number of reports showing either no changes or even down-regulation of AO systems in stressed plants. Moreover, ROS are recognized now as important second messengers operating in both local and systemic signalling, synergistically interacting with the primary stressor, to regulate gene expression needed for optimal acclimatization. This work critically assesses the suitability of using enzymatic AOs as a proxy for stress tolerance or as a target for crop genetic improvement. It is concluded that constitutively higher AO activity may interfere with stress-induced ROS signalling and be a disadvantage for plant stress tolerance. Enzymatic antioxidants cannot be used as a proxy for stress tolerance or as a target for crop genetic improvement due to interference with stress signalling by reactive oxygen species.