The effectiveness of Gen AI in assisting students' knowledge construction in humanities and social sciences courses: learning behaviour analysis

被引:0
作者
He, Shuai [1 ]
Lu, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Humanities, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Generative AI; ChatGPT; learning behaviour; knowledge construction; higher education; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2024.2415444
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Currently, generative AI has undergone rapid development. Numerous studies have attested to the benefits of Gen AI in programming, mathematics and other disciplines. However, since Gen AI mostly uses English as the intrinsic training parameter, it is more effective in facilitating the teaching of courses that use international common notation, but few scholars have researched the fitness of Gen AI-assisted teaching of humanities courses in Chinese-language environments. To address these gaps, this study examined the learning behaviours of 30 students using Gen AI to help them answer questions on economic law tests using the Lag Sequential Analysis. The results show that the following: (1) The use of Gen AI to aid learning in an economic law course did not significantly improve the cognitive level of academics from the perspective of knowledge construction. (2) According to the characteristics of students' behavioural paths via Gen AI-assisted learning, their behavioural patterns can be classified into autonomous and innovative, moderate, and lacking innovation. (3) Different learning modes when Gen AI-assisted teaching was used affected the final results, which were as follows: High-performing students favoured the autonomous and innovative pattern, medium-performing students favoured the moderate pattern, and low-performing students favoured the lacking innovation pattern.
引用
收藏
页码:7041 / 7062
页数:22
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Agustin, 2023, JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DA, V4, P921
  • [2] Akeman R., 1995, ANAL INTERACTION SEQ
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis
  • [4] Arndt, 2023, AI ED INVESTIGATION, DOI [10.48550/arxiv.2307.14206, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2307.14206]
  • [5] Bahrini Aram, 2023, 2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), P274, DOI 10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137850
  • [6] Baidoo-Anu D., 2023, J AI, V7, P52, DOI [DOI 10.61969/JAI.1337500, 10.2139/ssrn.4337484, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4337484]
  • [7] On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?
    Bender, Emily M.
    Gebru, Timnit
    McMillan-Major, Angelina
    Shmitchell, Shmargaret
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2021, 2021, : 610 - 623
  • [8] Programming Pluralism: Using Learning Analytics to Detect Patterns in the Learning of Computer Programming
    Blikstein, Paulo
    Worsley, Marcelo
    Piech, Chris
    Sahami, Mehran
    Cooper, Steven
    Koller, Daphne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2014, 23 (04) : 561 - 599
  • [9] Bozkurt A., 2023, Asian J. Distance Educ, V18, DOI [DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.7716416, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7716416]
  • [10] Dan S., 2024, RES E CHEM ED, P113, DOI [https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2024.03.016, DOI 10.13811/J.CNKI.EER.2024.03.016]