Effect of 3D Printing Orientation on the Accuracy and Surface Roughness of Polycarbonate Samples

被引:0
作者
Turek, Pawel [1 ]
Bazan, Anna [1 ]
Bulicz, Marcin [1 ]
机构
[1] Rzeszow Univ Technol, Dept Mfg Tech & Automat, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland
关键词
additive manufacturing; fused deposition modelling; geometrical accuracy; surface roughness; model orientation; FDM; PARTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/machines13010009
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The study evaluates models produced using fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology in five orientations, fabricated from polycarbonate (PC) material with a FORTUS 360mc printer. The models included simple shapes (planes and cylinders) and complex free-form surfaces. Accuracy was assessed using a GOM Scan 1 scanner and GOM Inspect 2019 software, focusing on 3D deviations and dimensional and geometric deviations (form, position, and orientation, which have not yet been analyzed in similar studies and may limit the usage of the printed elements). Surface roughness was analyzed using a MarSurf XR profilometer, measuring Ra and Rz parameters. All models were characterized by a predominance of negative 3D deviations. The analysis of variance showed no effect of model orientation on the values of linear dimensional deviations and geometric deviations. The largest deviations were negative and associated with the size of the models. The average value of the absolute deviation of linear dimensions associated with the size of the model was 0.30 mm. The average value of the absolute deviation of other linear dimensions was 0.07 mm. The average value of orientation and position deviations for each model varied in the range of 0.15-0.20 mm, and for form deviation 0.16-0.20 mm. One of the models had a higher surface roughness (Ra = 17.2 mu m, Rz = 71.3 mu m) than the other four models (Ra in the range of 12.7-13.8 mu m, Rz in the range of 57.2-61.2 mu m). During the research, three distinct surface types were identified on the models. The research indicated the validity of taking surface type into account when analyzing its microgeometry.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [21] Cekic A., 2020, P 31 DAAAM INT S MOS, P66, DOI [10.2507/31st.daaam.proceedings.009, DOI 10.2507/31ST.DAAAM.PROCEEDINGS.009]
  • [22] Pre and post processing techniques to improve surface characteristics of FDM parts: a state of art review and future applications
    Chohan, Jasgurpreet Singh
    Singh, Rupinder
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (03) : 495 - 513
  • [23] A CAD/CAM-prototyped anatomical condylar prosthesis connected to a custom-made bone plate to support a fibula free flap
    Ciocca, L.
    Mazzoni, S.
    Fantini, M.
    Persiani, F.
    Baldissara, P.
    Marchetti, C.
    Scotti, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2012, 50 (07) : 743 - 749
  • [24] Post-Processing of 3D-Printed Polymers
    Dizon, John Ryan C.
    Gache, Ciara Catherine L.
    Cascolan, Honelly Mae S.
    Cancino, Lina T.
    Advincula, Rigoberto C.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [25] Strength of threaded connections additively produced from polymeric materials
    Dziubek, Tomasz
    Budzik, Grzegorz
    Kawalec, Andrzej
    Debski, Mariusz
    Turek, Pawel
    Oleksy, Mariusz
    Paszkiewicz, Andrzej
    Polinski, Przernyslaw
    Kochmanski, Lukasz
    Kleibicki, Matelln
    Jozwik, Jerzy
    Kuric, Ivan
    Cebulski, Jozef
    [J]. POLIMERY, 2022, 67 (06) : 261 - 270
  • [26] Geometric and mechanical evaluation of 3D-printing materials for skull base anatomical education and endoscopic surgery simulation - A first step to create reliable customized simulators
    Favier, Valentin
    Zemiti, Nabil
    Mora, Oscar Caravaca
    Subsol, Gerard
    Captier, Guillaume
    Lebrun, Renaud
    Crampette, Louis
    Mondain, Michel
    Gilles, Benjamin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [27] The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering
    Gao, Wei
    Zhang, Yunbo
    Ramanujan, Devarajan
    Ramani, Karthik
    Chen, Yong
    Williams, Christopher B.
    Wang, Charlie C. L.
    Shin, Yung C.
    Zhang, Song
    Zavattieri, Pablo D.
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2015, 69 : 65 - 89
  • [28] Comparative study of geometric properties of unreinforced PLA and PLA-Graphene composite materials applied to additive manufacturing using FFF technology
    Garcia, E.
    Nunez, P. J.
    Chacon, J. M.
    Caminero, M. A.
    Kamarthi, S.
    [J]. POLYMER TESTING, 2020, 91 (91)
  • [29] Analysis of PLA Geometric Properties Processed by FFF Additive Manufacturing: Effects of Process Parameters and Plate-Extruder Precision Motion
    Garcia Plaza, Eustaquio
    Nunez Lopez, Pedro Jose
    Caminero Torija, Miguel Angel
    Chacon Munoz, Jesus Miguel
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2019, 11 (10)
  • [30] Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends
    Gardan, Julien
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (10) : 3118 - 3132