Effect of 3D Printing Orientation on the Accuracy and Surface Roughness of Polycarbonate Samples

被引:0
作者
Turek, Pawel [1 ]
Bazan, Anna [1 ]
Bulicz, Marcin [1 ]
机构
[1] Rzeszow Univ Technol, Dept Mfg Tech & Automat, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland
关键词
additive manufacturing; fused deposition modelling; geometrical accuracy; surface roughness; model orientation; FDM; PARTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/machines13010009
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The study evaluates models produced using fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology in five orientations, fabricated from polycarbonate (PC) material with a FORTUS 360mc printer. The models included simple shapes (planes and cylinders) and complex free-form surfaces. Accuracy was assessed using a GOM Scan 1 scanner and GOM Inspect 2019 software, focusing on 3D deviations and dimensional and geometric deviations (form, position, and orientation, which have not yet been analyzed in similar studies and may limit the usage of the printed elements). Surface roughness was analyzed using a MarSurf XR profilometer, measuring Ra and Rz parameters. All models were characterized by a predominance of negative 3D deviations. The analysis of variance showed no effect of model orientation on the values of linear dimensional deviations and geometric deviations. The largest deviations were negative and associated with the size of the models. The average value of the absolute deviation of linear dimensions associated with the size of the model was 0.30 mm. The average value of the absolute deviation of other linear dimensions was 0.07 mm. The average value of orientation and position deviations for each model varied in the range of 0.15-0.20 mm, and for form deviation 0.16-0.20 mm. One of the models had a higher surface roughness (Ra = 17.2 mu m, Rz = 71.3 mu m) than the other four models (Ra in the range of 12.7-13.8 mu m, Rz in the range of 57.2-61.2 mu m). During the research, three distinct surface types were identified on the models. The research indicated the validity of taking surface type into account when analyzing its microgeometry.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Alternative production strategies based on the comparison of additive and traditional manufacturing technologies
    Achillas, Charisios
    Tzetzis, Dimitrios
    Raimondo, Maria Olga
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (12) : 3497 - 3509
  • [2] Enhanced Dimensional Accuracy of Material Extrusion 3D-Printed Plastics through Filament Architecture
    Ai, Jia-Ruey
    Peng, Fang
    Joo, Piljae
    Vogt, Bryan D.
    [J]. ACS APPLIED POLYMER MATERIALS, 2021, 3 (05): : 2518 - 2528
  • [3] Design and manufacture of a high precision personalized electron bolus device for radiation therapy
    Aldawood, Faisal Khaled
    Chang, Sha X.
    Desai, Salil
    [J]. Medical Devices and Sensors, 2020, 3 (06)
  • [4] Impact of Printing Orientation on the Accuracy of Additively Fabricated Denture Base Materials: A Systematic Review
    AlGhamdi, Maram A.
    Gad, Mohammed M.
    [J]. DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [5] Alsoufi M.S., 2017, American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, V5, P211, DOI [10.12691/ajme-5-5-4, DOI 10.12691/AJME-5-5-4]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)FundamentalsConcepts, Principles and Rules
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, Dimensioning and Tolerancing - Y14.5 - 2018
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2023, Additive ManufacturingGeneral PrinciplesPart Positioning, Coordinates and Orientation
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2021, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)Surface Texture: ProfilePart 3: Specification Operators
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2010, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)ISO Code System for Tolerances on Linear SizesPart 2: Tables of Standard Tolerance Classes and Limit Deviations for Holes and Shafts