Examining health care champions: a mixed-methods study exploring self and peer perspectives of champions

被引:14
作者
George, Emily R. [1 ]
Sabin, Lora L. [1 ]
Elliott, Patricia A. [1 ]
Wolff, James A. [1 ]
Osani, Mikala C. [1 ]
Hong, Jorma McSwiggan [1 ]
Berry, William R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02445 USA
[2] Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA USA
来源
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE | 2022年 / 3卷
关键词
champion; clinician; health; implementation; innovation; intervention-implementation interface; mixed-methods; AGREEMENT; RATINGS;
D O I
10.1177/26334895221077880
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Champions are widely recognized as playing a key role in the successful implementation of evidence-based interventions within the health care sector; however, little is known about which characteristics and skills enable them to play that role. Furthermore, previous studies have measured only individual champions' responses to personal attributes without incorporating input from other observers. A mixed-methods study was conducted to identify, analyze, and group the behaviors and characteristics of champions who have successfully promoted the adoption of new initiatives within the health care delivery system, taking into consideration self and peer perspectives.Methods Using a mixed-methods, cross-sectional triangulation design with a convergence model, quantitative data were collected and analyzed from health care champions (n = 30) and their colleagues (n = 58) from 11 countries using a survey. Every champion and a subset of colleagues (n = 14) also participated in in-depth interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to explore the relationship between champion and colleague responses to survey items; chi-squared tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the differences. Thematic content analysis of qualitative data was used to explore champion-like behaviors and features. Characteristics of champions were categorized using the Transformational Leadership Theory framework.Results Champions exhibited characteristics that facilitated trust and encouraged motivation among their colleagues to adopt innovations, such as being intrinsically motivated, persistent, enthusiastic, and highly effective communicators. Champions were described by their colleagues as empathetic, curious, physically present, approachable, and often soliciting feedback from others. Although there was a high degree of agreement between champion and colleague survey responses, champions were more likely to underrate their skills and abilities to instigate change compared to their colleagues.Conclusion Both champions and colleagues described key champion-like characteristics, but champions often downplayed the characteristics and behaviors that make champions uniquely effective at facilitating the adoption of evidence-based interventions.Plan language abstract Health care champions are people who promote the adoption of new initiatives to improve the quality of patient care among their colleagues within health care settings. Champions are often viewed by organizational leaders and researchers as critical for the successful implementation of new ideas; however, little is known about what specific skills or characteristics make them effective at promoting the adoption of new ideas among their colleagues. Most studies on champions' behaviors have only included the perspectives of champions, and not perspectives from others within the organization. The goal of our study was to not only explore champions' perspectives of themselves, but also the views of champions' colleagues to understand why and how champions motivated and influenced their colleagues to try new things. Findings from this study could lead to more accurate identification of health care champions, which in turn could lead to more efficient and effective adoption of new initiatives to improve the quality of patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   SELF-RATINGS AND SUPERVISOR RATINGS OF GRADUATE EMPLOYEES COMPETENCES DURING EARLY CAREER [J].
ARNOLD, J ;
DAVEY, KM .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 65 :235-250
[2]   Self-other agreement: Does it really matter? [J].
Atwater, LE ;
Ostroff, C ;
Yammarino, FJ ;
Fleenor, JW .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) :577-598
[3]  
Bass B. M., 2006, Transformational leadership, V2nd edition
[4]   Supporting nurse health champions: Developing a 'new generation' of health improvement facilitators [J].
Blake, H. ;
Chambers, D. .
HEALTH EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2012, 71 (02) :205-210
[5]  
Brownson RC., 2012, Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice
[6]   A PROCESS MODEL OF INTERNAL CORPORATE VENTURING IN THE DIVERSIFIED MAJOR FIRM [J].
BURGELMAN, RA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1983, 28 (02) :223-244
[7]   Self-ratings in training programs: An examination of level of performance and the effects of feedback [J].
Carless, SA ;
Roberts-Thompson, GP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2001, 9 (03) :217-225
[8]  
Chyung S.Y., 2017, Perform. Improv., V56, P15, DOI [10.1002/pfi.21727, DOI 10.1002/PFI.21727]
[9]  
Creswell JW, 2010, DESIGNING CONDUCTING
[10]   Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science [J].
Damschroder, Laura J. ;
Aron, David C. ;
Keith, Rosalind E. ;
Kirsh, Susan R. ;
Alexander, Jeffery A. ;
Lowery, Julie C. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4