Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: experience of a single center

被引:0
|
作者
Araujo, Debora [1 ]
Gromicho, Alexandre [2 ]
Dias, Jorge [1 ]
Bastos, Samuel [1 ]
Gregorio, Tiago [3 ]
Oliveira, Vitor [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Ctr Vila Nova de Gaia & Espinho, Urol Dept, P-4405843 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
[2] Hosp Ctr Funchal, Urol Dept, P-9004514 Madeira, Portugal
[3] Hosp Ctr Vila Nova de Gaia & Espinho, Internal Med Dept, P-4405843 Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
来源
REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE ANDROLOGIA | 2024年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
Vasoepididymostomy; Vasovasostomy; Vasectomy reversal; Patency rate; Pregnancy rate; VASOVASOSTOMY; PATENCY; VASOEPIDIDYMOSTOMY; PREDICTORS; PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.22514/j.androl.2024.025
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Vasectomy reversal (VR) is the only technique that allows men previously submitted to a vasectomy to conceive by natural pregnancy. We report our experience with microsurgical VR and identify predictive factors of natural pregnancy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients submitted to VR by a single surgeon from 2008 to 2021 at our single center. Patency and pregnancy rates were evaluated. The main outcomes after surgery were the patency and natural pregnancy rates. Secondary outcomes were the identification of predictive factors of success and patient satisfaction with the natural pregnancy. Results: Forty VRs were performed with a patency rate of 97.1% and, among those who became patent, pregnancy occurred in 13 of 31 couples by natural conception (41.9%). Two-layer anastomosis was significantly associated with a successful procedure (Odds Ratio of 12.428; p = 0.045). We did not identify a significant association between any of the other variables and a successful outcome. Even without a successful surgery, most of the patients were very satisfied with the results and would do the procedure again. Conclusions: VR is a useful technique for men previously submitted to a vasectomy and who pretend to have children by natural conception. Two- layer anastomosis is significantly associated with a successful surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 16
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors Predicting Successful Microsurgical Vasectomy Reversal
    Nagler, Harris M.
    Jung, Howard
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 36 (03) : 383 - +
  • [2] Vasectomy reversal using a microsurgical three-layer technique: one surgeon's experience over 18 years with 1300 patients
    Schwarzer, J. U.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2012, 35 (05): : 706 - 713
  • [3] Nomograms to Predict Patency After Microsurgical Vasectomy Reversal
    Hsiao, Wayland
    Goldstein, Marc
    Rosoff, James S.
    Piccorelli, Annalisa
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Greenwood, Eleni A.
    Mulhall, John P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (02) : 607 - 612
  • [4] Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: contemporary techniques, intraoperative decision making, and surgical training for the next generation
    Hayden, Russell P.
    Li, Philip S.
    Goldstein, Marc
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 111 (03) : 444 - 453
  • [5] Desire to have children after vasectomy. Vasectomy reversal or assisted reproductive technology?
    Soave, Armin
    Kliesch, Sabine
    Cremers, Jann-Frederik
    UROLOGIE, 2024, 63 (11): : 1111 - 1121
  • [6] Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners
    Chan, PTK
    Goldstein, M
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (05) : 1371 - 1374
  • [7] Microsurgical vasectomy reversal : results and predictors of success
    Dohle, Gert R.
    Smit, Marij
    BASIC AND CLINICAL ANDROLOGY, 2005, 15 (02): : 172 - 177
  • [8] Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: results and predictors of success
    Gert R. Dohle
    Marij Smit
    Andrologie, 2005, 15 (2): : 167 - 171
  • [9] The Evolution of Vasectomy Reversal
    Dickey, Ryan M.
    Pastuszak, Alexander W.
    Hakky, Tariq S.
    Chandrashekar, Aravind
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Lipshultz, Larry I.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (06)
  • [10] The Evolution of Vasectomy Reversal
    Ryan M. Dickey
    Alexander W. Pastuszak
    Tariq S. Hakky
    Aravind Chandrashekar
    Ranjith Ramasamy
    Larry I. Lipshultz
    Current Urology Reports, 2015, 16