Drought stimulus enhanced stress tolerance in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) by improving physiological characteristics, growth, and water productivity

被引:3
作者
Ru, Chen [1 ]
Hu, Xiaotao [2 ]
Chen, Dianyu [2 ]
Wang, Wene [2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Agr Univ, Sch Engn, Hefei 230036, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid & Semiarid Area, Minist Educ, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
关键词
Drought stimulus; Rehydration; Physiological characteristics; Stress tolerance; Water productivity; BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PLANT-RESPONSES; NORTHWEST CHINA; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; ANTIOXIDANT; MAIZE; LEAF; ARABIDOPSIS; METABOLISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108906
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The impact of drought events on the growth and yield of wheat plants has been extensively reported; however, limited information is available on the changes in physiological characteristics and their effects on the growth and water productivity of wheat after repeated drought stimuli. Moreover, whether appropriate drought stimulus can improve stress resistance in plants by improving physiological traits remains to be explored. Thus, in this study, a pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of intermittent and persistent mild [65%-75% soil water-holding capacity (SWHC)], moderate (55%-65% SWHC), and severe drought (45%-55% SWHC) stress on the growth, physiological characteristics, yield, and water-use efficiency (WUE) of winter wheat. After the second stress stimulus, persistent severe drought stress resulted in 30.98%, 234.62%, 53.80%, and 31.00% reduction in leaf relative water content, leaf water potential, photosynthetic rate (Pn), and indole-3-acetic acid content (IAA), respectively, compared to the control plants. However, abscisic acid content, antioxidant enzyme activities, and osmoregulatory substance contents increased significantly under drought stress, especially under persistent drought stress. After the second rehydration stimulus (ASRR), the actual and maximum efficiency of PSII and leaf water status in the plants exposed to intermittent moderate drought (IS2) stress were restored to the control levels, resulting in Pnbeing 102.56% of the control values; instantaneous WUE of the plants exposed to persistent severe drought stress was 1.79 times that of the control plants. In addition, the activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and glutathione reductase, as well as the content of proline, under persistent mild drought stress increased by 52.98%, 33.47%, 51.95%, 52.35%, and 17.07% at ASRR, respectively, compared to the control plants, which provided continuous antioxidant protection to wheat plants. This was also demonstrated by the lower H2O2 and MDA contents after rehydration. At ASRR, the IAA content in the IS2 and persistent moderate drought treatments increased by 36.23% and 19.61%, respectively, compared to the control plants, which favored increased aboveground dry mass and plant height. Compared to the control plants, IS2 significantly increased wheat yield, WUE for grain yield, and WUE for biomass, by 10.15%, 32.94%, and 33.16%, respectively. Collectively, IS2 increased grain growth, yield, and WUE, which could be mainly attributed to improved physiological characteristics after drought-stimulated rehydration.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Genotypic variation in drought stress response and subsequent recovery of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    Vassileva, Valya
    Signarbieux, Constant
    Anders, Iwona
    Feller, Urs
    JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH, 2011, 124 (01) : 147 - 154
  • [43] Drought tolerance in Triticum aestivum L. genotypes associated with enhanced antioxidative protection and declined lipid peroxidation
    Upadhyay, Deepali
    Budhlakoti, Neeraj
    Singh, Amit Kumar
    Bansal, Ruchi
    Kumari, Jyoti
    Chaudhary, Nidhee
    Padaria, Jasdeep Chatrath
    Sareen, Sindhu
    Kumar, Sundeep
    3 BIOTECH, 2020, 10 (06)
  • [44] Assessment of variation in drought tolerance using some key physiological criteria in potential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars of different geographic origins
    Ashraf, Muhammad
    Ali, Qasim
    Ashraf, Muhammad Arslan
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (11) : 1503 - 1516
  • [45] Improved tolerance to drought stress after anthesis due to priming before anthesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) var. Vinjett
    Wang, Xiao
    Vignjevic, Marija
    Jiang, Dong
    Jacobsen, Susanne
    Wollenweber, Bernd
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2014, 65 (22) : 6441 - 6456
  • [46] Alleviating Drought Stress Tolerance in Sensitive Genotype of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Through Exogenous Application of Root Exudates
    Ahlawat, Om Parkash
    Walia, Nisha
    Sheoran, Sonia
    Venkatesh, Karnam
    Sharma, Pradeep
    Mamrutha, H. M.
    Rinki, Ratan
    Tiwari, Ratan
    Singh, Gyanendra
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2025,
  • [47] Glycinebetaine applied under drought improved the physiological efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant
    Raza, Muhammad Aown Sammar
    Saleem, Muhammad Farrukh
    Ashraf, Muhammad Yasin
    Ali, Asghar
    Asghar, Hafiz Naeem
    SOIL & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 31 (01) : 67 - 71
  • [48] Overexpression of AtWRKY30 Transcription Factor Enhances Heat and Drought Stress Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    El-Esawi, Mohamed A.
    Al-Ghamdi, Abdullah A.
    Ali, Hayssam M.
    Ahmad, Margaret
    GENES, 2019, 10 (02)
  • [49] Differential Activity and Expression Profile of Antioxidant Enzymes and Physiological Changes in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Under Drought
    Sheoran, Sonia
    Thakur, Vidisha
    Narwal, Sneh
    Turan, Rajita
    Mamrutha, H. M.
    Singh, Virender
    Tiwari, Vinod
    Sharma, Indu
    APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 177 (06) : 1282 - 1298
  • [50] Genetic analysis of tolerance to photo-oxidative stress induced by high light in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    Li, Hongwei
    Tong, Yiping
    Li, Bin
    Jing, Ruilian
    Lu, Congming
    Li, Zhensheng
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 399 - 412