Commitment to the truth creates trust in market exchange: Experimental evidence ☆

被引:0
作者
Jacquemet, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
Luchini, Stephane [3 ]
Shogren, Jason F. [4 ]
Zylbersztejn, Adam [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Paris Sch Econ, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, Paris, France
[3] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, AMSE, Marseille, France
[4] Univ Wyoming, Dept Econ, Laramie, WY USA
[5] Univ Lumiere Lyon 2, Univ Jean Monnet St Etienne, Emlyon Business Sch, CNRS,GATE, F-69007 Lyon, France
[6] Vistula Univ Warsaw AFiBV, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Trust game; Cooperation; Communication; Commitment; Deception; Fine; Oath; SOCIAL NORMS; COMMUNICATION; OATHS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geb.2024.09.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Under incomplete contracts, the mutual belief in reciprocity facilitates how traders create value through economic exchange. Creating such beliefs among strangers can be challenging even when they are allowed to communicate, because communication is cheap. In this paper, we first extend the literature showing that a truth-telling oath increases honesty to a sequential trust game with pre-play, fixed-form, and cheap-talk communication. Our results confirm that the oath creates more trust and cooperative behavior thanks to an improvement in communication; but we also show that the oath induces selection into communication - it makes people more wary of using communication, precisely because communication speaks louder under oath. We next designed additional treatments featuring mild and deterrent fines for deception to measure the monetary equivalent of the non-monetary incentives implemented by a truth-telling oath. We find that the oath is behaviorally equivalent to mild fines. The deterrent fine induces the highest level of cooperation. Altogether, these results confirm that allowing for interactions under oath within a trust game with communication creates significantly more economic value than the identical exchange institutions without the oath.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 295
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Algan Y, 2014, HBK ECON, P49, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53538-2.00002-2
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, BOWLING ALONE, DOI [10.1145/358916.361990, DOI 10.1145/358916.361990]
  • [3] Beauvois J.L., 2010, La soumission librement consentie
  • [4] Can Honesty Oaths, Peer Interaction, or Monitoring Mitigate Lying?
    Beck, Tobias
    Buehren, Christoph
    Frank, Bjoern
    Khachatryan, Elina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 163 (03) : 467 - 484
  • [5] Optimal grouping of commodities for indirect taxation
    Belan, Pascal
    Gauthier, Stephane
    Laroque, Guy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (07) : 1738 - 1750
  • [6] TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY
    BERG, J
    DICKHAUT, J
    MCCABE, K
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) : 122 - 142
  • [7] The social significance of subtle signals
    Bird, Rebecca Bliege
    Ready, Elspeth
    Power, Eleanor A.
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 2 (07): : 452 - 457
  • [8] More order with less law: On contract enforcement, trust, and crowding
    Bohnet, I
    Frey, BS
    Huck, S
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (01) : 131 - 144
  • [9] Efficiency in the trust game: an experimental study of precommitment
    Bracht, Juergen
    Feltovich, Nick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 2008, 37 (01) : 39 - 72
  • [10] Whatever you say, your reputation precedes you: Observation and cheap talk in the trust game
    Bracht, Juergen
    Feltovich, Nick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2009, 93 (9-10) : 1036 - 1044