Governing marine cloud brightening for ecosystem conservation under a warming climate

被引:0
作者
Foster, Rose [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shumway, Nicole [1 ,3 ]
Harrison, Daniel [4 ]
Fidelman, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Policy Futures, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Law, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Australia
[4] Southern Cross Univ, Lismore, Australia
关键词
Marine cloud brightening; Environmental governance; Climate change; Ecosystem conservation; RADIATION MANAGEMENT; TOLLGATE PRINCIPLES; GOVERNANCE; FUTURE; RISK; ANTHROPOCENE; TECHNOLOGIES; RESTORATION; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.esg.2025.100240
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB) is an emerging technology designed to mitigate the impacts of climate change by increasing the reflectivity of low-lying marine clouds. As research into this technology advances, the question of how to govern its trials and deployment becomes increasingly important. This paper identifies 12 challenges and 13 recommendations for governance of MCB, based on a systematic review of 27 publications. These findings are explored in relation to the design of effective MCB governance, with a particular focus on potential smallscale applications for ecosystem conservation purposes, like coral bleaching mitigation. The paper underscores the existing knowledge gaps and potential avenues for future MCB governance research, contributing to the burgeoning literature on the governance of innovative technologies aimed at addressing global environmental challenges. To manage potential risks and maximise potential benefits, it is crucial to understand the governance challenges MCB presents and explore options to address these challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [71] Governing solar geoengineering research as it leaves the laboratory
    Parker, Andy
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2014, 372 (2031):
  • [72] Toward an evidence-informed, responsible, and inclusive debate on solar geoengineering: A response to the proposed non-use agreement
    Parson, Edward A.
    Buck, Holly J.
    Jinnah, Sikina
    Moreno-Cruz, Juan
    Nicholson, Simon
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 15 (05)
  • [73] Payne CymieR., 2015, Climate Law, V5, P210, DOI DOI 10.1163/18786561-00504005
  • [74] Geoengineering, Scientific Community, and Policymakers: A New Proposal for the Categorization of Responses to Anthropogenic Climate Change
    Pereira, Joana Castro
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (01):
  • [75] The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers
    Pickering, Catherine
    Byrne, Jason
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 33 (03) : 534 - 548
  • [76] Regional climate engineering by radiation management: Prerequisites and prospects
    Quaas, Johannes
    Quaas, Martin F.
    Boucher, Olivier
    Rickels, Wilfried
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2016, 4 (12) : 618 - 625
  • [77] A preliminary framework for understanding the governance of novel environmental technologies: Ambiguity, indeterminateness and drift
    Rabitz, Florian
    Feist, Marian
    Honegger, Matthias
    Horton, Joshua
    Jinnah, Sikina
    Reynolds, Jesse
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEM GOVERNANCE, 2022, 12
  • [78] Governing the termination problem in solar radiation management
    Rabitz, Florian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2019, 28 (03) : 502 - 522
  • [79] The Oxford Principles
    Rayner, Steve
    Heyward, Clare
    Kruger, Tim
    Pidgeon, Nick
    Redgwell, Catherine
    Savulescu, Julian
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 121 (03) : 499 - 512
  • [80] Reynolds J.L., 2019, The Governance of Solar Geoengineering: Managing Climate Change in the Anthropocene, P1, DOI [10.1017/9781316676790.001, DOI 10.1017/9781316676790.001]