Governing marine cloud brightening for ecosystem conservation under a warming climate

被引:0
作者
Foster, Rose [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shumway, Nicole [1 ,3 ]
Harrison, Daniel [4 ]
Fidelman, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Policy Futures, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Law, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Australia
[4] Southern Cross Univ, Lismore, Australia
关键词
Marine cloud brightening; Environmental governance; Climate change; Ecosystem conservation; RADIATION MANAGEMENT; TOLLGATE PRINCIPLES; GOVERNANCE; FUTURE; RISK; ANTHROPOCENE; TECHNOLOGIES; RESTORATION; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.esg.2025.100240
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB) is an emerging technology designed to mitigate the impacts of climate change by increasing the reflectivity of low-lying marine clouds. As research into this technology advances, the question of how to govern its trials and deployment becomes increasingly important. This paper identifies 12 challenges and 13 recommendations for governance of MCB, based on a systematic review of 27 publications. These findings are explored in relation to the design of effective MCB governance, with a particular focus on potential smallscale applications for ecosystem conservation purposes, like coral bleaching mitigation. The paper underscores the existing knowledge gaps and potential avenues for future MCB governance research, contributing to the burgeoning literature on the governance of innovative technologies aimed at addressing global environmental challenges. To manage potential risks and maximise potential benefits, it is crucial to understand the governance challenges MCB presents and explore options to address these challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Upgrading Marine Ecosystem Restoration Using Ecological-Social Concepts
    Abelson, Avigdor
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Reed, Daniel C.
    Orth, Robert J.
    Kendrick, Gary A.
    Beck, Michael W.
    Belmaker, Jonathan
    Krause, Gesche
    Edgar, Graham J.
    Airoldi, Laura
    Brokovich, Eran
    France, Robert
    Shashar, Nadav
    De Blaeij, Arianne
    Stambler, Noga
    Salameh, Pierre
    Shechter, Mordechai
    Nelson, Peter A.
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2016, 66 (02) : 156 - 163
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1972, CONV PREV MAR POLL D
  • [3] Anthony Andrew, 2022, The Guardian
  • [4] The impacts of trail infrastructure on vegetation and soils: Current literature and future directions
    Ballantyne, Mark
    Pickering, Catherine Marina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 164 : 53 - 64
  • [6] Bay L.K., 2019, T3: Intervention Technical Summary-A Report provided to the Australian Government by the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program
  • [7] 'Slippery slope' or 'uphill struggle'? Broadening out expert scenarios of climate engineering research and development
    Bellamy, Rob
    Healey, Peter
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2018, 83 : 1 - 10
  • [8] A review of climate geoengineering appraisals
    Bellamy, Rob
    Chilvers, Jason
    Vaughan, Naomi E.
    Lenton, Timothy M.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 3 (06) : 597 - 615
  • [9] Solar geoengineering: The case for an international non-use agreement
    Biermann, Frank
    Oomen, Jeroen
    Gupta, Aarti
    Ali, Saleem H.
    Conca, Ken
    Hajer, Maarten A.
    Kashwan, Prakash
    Kotze, Louis J.
    Leach, Melissa
    Messner, Dirk
    Okereke, Chukwumerije
    Persson, Asa
    Potocnik, Janez
    Schlosberg, David
    Scobie, Michelle
    VanDeveer, Stacy D.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 13 (03)
  • [10] Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation
    Boucher, Olivier
    Forster, Piers M.
    Gruber, Nicolas
    Ha-Duong, Minh
    Lawrence, Mark G.
    Lenton, Timothy M.
    Maas, Achim
    Vaughan, Naomi E.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 5 (01) : 23 - 35