Validation of Brazilian Version of the Sexual Desire Inventory 2 (SDI-2)

被引:0
作者
Cartagena-Ramos, Denisse [1 ]
Fuentealba-Torres, Miguel [2 ]
Rebustini, Flavio [3 ]
Alves, Josilene [4 ]
Scholze, Alessandro [5 ]
Lara, Lucia Alves da Silva [6 ]
Arcencio, Ricardo [7 ]
Nascimento, Lucila Castanheira [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Andres Bello, Fac Enfermeria, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ los Andes, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Artes Ciencias & Human, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Mato Grosso, Cuiaba, MT, Brazil
[5] Univ Estadual Norte Parana, Jacarezinho, PR, Brazil
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[7] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Enfermagem, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[8] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Enfermagem Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA | 2024年 / 46卷
关键词
Libido; Sexual desire; Cross-cultural comparison; Psychometrics; Sexual behavior; Surveys and questionnaires; UNITED-STATES; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; METHODOLOGIES; DYSFUNCTION; ADAPTATION; VALIDITY; WOMEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To traslate and validate of the Brazilian version of the SDI-2. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The cultural adaptation considered the stages of initial translation, synthesis of translations, evaluation by a committee of experts from different regions of Brazil, back-translation, and pre-test. The content validity and psychometric proprieties was assessed. Results: Ten specialists participated in the cultural adaptation of the SDI-2. The content validity showed a Content Validity Ratio [CVR) >= 0.75 [p = 0.05). A total of 674 subjects participated in the field study. The Exploratory Factorial Analysis [EFA) presented factor loads >= 0.445, and commonalities >= 0.40; and two dimensions represented 77%ofthe total variance explained. The Confirmatory Factorial Analysis CFA presented X 2 /df = 4.265; the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation RMSEA = 0.110; the Non-Normed Fit Index NNFI = 0.946; the Comparative Fit Index [CFI) = 0.963; the Goodness of Fit Index GFI = 0.986; and the Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index AGFI = 0.979 for a two-factor model. The coefficient values forthe total SDI-2 score were 0.91 for Cronbach's alpha, 0.91 for McDonald's Omega, and 0.97 for the Greatest Lower Bound GLB coefficients. The invariance between sexes was 0.01 for the Delta CFI and Delta RMSEA, showing model stability for these two populations. Conclusion: The Brazilian version of the SDI-2 is self-report, valid, reliable and invariant across sex.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Abdo CH, 2000, Rev Bras Med, V57, P1329
[2]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[3]  
Brown TA., 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[4]  
Cartagena-Ramos D, 2024, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V70, DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.20240362
[5]   Systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments to measure sexual desire [J].
Cartagena-Ramos, Denisse ;
Fuentealba-Torres, Miguel ;
Rebustini, Flavio ;
Andrade Biaggi Leite, Ana Carolina ;
Alvarenga, Willyane de Andrade ;
Arcencio, Ricardo Alexandre ;
Spadoti Dantas, Rosana Aparecida ;
Nascimento, Lucila Castanheira .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
[6]   Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) :464-504
[7]  
Costello A B., 2005, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT, DOI [10.7275/jyj1-4868, DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868]
[8]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[9]  
Davis A.J., 1992, APPL NURS RES, V5, P104, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
[10]   A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus [J].
Epstein, Jonathan ;
Santo, Ruth Miyuki ;
Guillemina, Francis .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (04) :435-441