Machine learning for the diagnosis accuracy of bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Pan, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Pushi [2 ]
Xue, Bowen [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Yanbin [2 ]
Shen, Xinhua [1 ]
Wang, Shiliang [1 ]
Wang, Xing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huzhou Univ, Huzhou Municipal Hosp 3, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Neurosis & Psychosomat Dis, Huzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] NCMHC, Natl Ctr Mental Hlth, Dept Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Mental Hlth Ctr, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 7, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
depression; bipolar disorder; machine learning; predictive model; systematic review; DEPRESSION; UNIPOLAR; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1515549
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnosing bipolar disorder poses a challenge in clinical practice and demands a substantial time investment. With the growing utilization of artificial intelligence in mental health, researchers are endeavoring to create AI-based diagnostic models. In this context, some researchers have sought to develop machine learning models for bipolar disorder diagnosis. Nevertheless, the accuracy of these diagnoses remains a subject of controversy. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review to comprehensively assess the diagnostic value of machine learning in the context of bipolar disorder. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with the search ending on April 1, 2023. QUADAS-2 was applied to assess the quality of the literature included. In addition, we employed a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis. Results: 18 studies were included, covering 3152 participants, including 1858 cases of bipolar disorder. 28 machine learning models were encompassed. Sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between bipolar disorder and normal individuals were 0.88 (9.5% CI: 0.74 similar to 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73 similar to 0.96) respectively, and the SROC curve was 0.94(95% CI: 0.92 similar to 0.96). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between bipolar disorder and depression were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80 similar to 0.87) and 0.82 (95%CI: 0.75 similar to 0.88) respectively. The SROC curve was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.86 similar to 0.91). Conclusions: Machine learning methods can be employed for discriminating and diagnosing bipolar disorder. However, in current research, they are predominantly utilized for binary classification tasks, limiting their progress in clinical practice. Therefore, in future studies, we anticipate the development of more multi-class classification tasks to enhance the clinical applicability of these methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Divergent and Convergent Imaging Markers Between Bipolar and Unipolar Depression Based on Machine Learning
    Zhang, Huifeng
    Zhou, Zhen
    Ding, Lei
    Wu, Chuangxin
    Qiu, Meihui
    Huang, Yueqi
    Jin, Feng
    Shen, Ting
    Yang, Yao
    Hsu, Li-Ming
    Wang, Jinhong
    Zhang, Han
    Shen, Dinggang
    Peng, Daihui
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2022, 26 (08) : 4100 - 4110
  • [32] Zhao Z., 2023, SE-1DCNN-LSTM: A Deep Learning Framework for EEG-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. Human Brain and Artificial Intelligence
  • [33] SE-1DCNN-LSTM: A Deep Learning Framework for EEG-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder
    Zhao, Ziyu
    Shen, Hui
    Hu, Dewen
    Zhang, Kerang
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, HBAI 2022, 2023, 1692 : 60 - 72
  • [34] Zhao ZY., 2022, INT WORKSHOP HUMAN B
  • [35] Can P300 aid in the differential diagnosis of unipolar disorder versus bipolar disorder depression? A meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Zhong, Bao-Liang
    Xu, Yan-Min
    Xie, Wu-Xiang
    Li, Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 245 : 219 - 227