Machine learning for the diagnosis accuracy of bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Pan, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Pushi [2 ]
Xue, Bowen [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Yanbin [2 ]
Shen, Xinhua [1 ]
Wang, Shiliang [1 ]
Wang, Xing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huzhou Univ, Huzhou Municipal Hosp 3, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Neurosis & Psychosomat Dis, Huzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] NCMHC, Natl Ctr Mental Hlth, Dept Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Mental Hlth Ctr, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 7, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
depression; bipolar disorder; machine learning; predictive model; systematic review; DEPRESSION; UNIPOLAR; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1515549
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnosing bipolar disorder poses a challenge in clinical practice and demands a substantial time investment. With the growing utilization of artificial intelligence in mental health, researchers are endeavoring to create AI-based diagnostic models. In this context, some researchers have sought to develop machine learning models for bipolar disorder diagnosis. Nevertheless, the accuracy of these diagnoses remains a subject of controversy. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review to comprehensively assess the diagnostic value of machine learning in the context of bipolar disorder. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with the search ending on April 1, 2023. QUADAS-2 was applied to assess the quality of the literature included. In addition, we employed a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis. Results: 18 studies were included, covering 3152 participants, including 1858 cases of bipolar disorder. 28 machine learning models were encompassed. Sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between bipolar disorder and normal individuals were 0.88 (9.5% CI: 0.74 similar to 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73 similar to 0.96) respectively, and the SROC curve was 0.94(95% CI: 0.92 similar to 0.96). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between bipolar disorder and depression were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80 similar to 0.87) and 0.82 (95%CI: 0.75 similar to 0.88) respectively. The SROC curve was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.86 similar to 0.91). Conclusions: Machine learning methods can be employed for discriminating and diagnosing bipolar disorder. However, in current research, they are predominantly utilized for binary classification tasks, limiting their progress in clinical practice. Therefore, in future studies, we anticipate the development of more multi-class classification tasks to enhance the clinical applicability of these methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Psychotic symptoms in bipolar disorder and their impact on the illness: A systematic review
    Chakrabarti, Subho
    Singh, Navdeep
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 12 (09): : 1204 - 1232
  • [2] What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from theENIGMABipolar Disorder Working Group
    Ching, Christopher R. K.
    Hibar, Derrek P.
    Gurholt, Tiril P.
    Nunes, Abraham
    Thomopoulos, Sophia I.
    Abe, Christoph
    Agartz, Ingrid
    Brouwer, Rachel M.
    Cannon, Dara M.
    de Zwarte, Sonja M. C.
    Eyler, Lisa T.
    Favre, Pauline
    Hajek, Tomas
    Haukvik, Unn K.
    Houenou, Josselin
    Landen, Mikael
    Lett, Tristram A.
    McDonald, Colm
    Nabulsi, Leila
    Patel, Yash
    Pauling, Melissa E.
    Paus, Tomas
    Radua, Joaquim
    Soeiro-de-Souza, Marcio G.
    Tronchin, Giulia
    van Haren, Neeltje E. M.
    Vieta, Eduard
    Walter, Henrik
    Zeng, Ling-Li
    Alda, Martin
    Almeida, Jorge
    Alnaes, Dag
    Alonso-Lana, Silvia
    Altimus, Cara
    Bauer, Michael
    Baune, Bernhard T.
    Bearden, Carrie E.
    Bellani, Marcella
    Benedetti, Francesco
    Berk, Michael
    Bilderbeck, Amy C.
    Blumberg, Hilary P.
    Boen, Erlend
    Bollettini, Irene
    del Mar Bonnin, Caterina
    Brambilla, Paolo
    Canales-Rodriguez, Erick J.
    Caseras, Xavier
    Dandash, Orwa
    Dannlowski, Udo
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2022, 43 (01) : 56 - 82
  • [3] Machine learning approaches for prediction of bipolar disorder based on biological, clinical and neuropsychological markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Colombo, Federica
    Calesella, Federico
    Mazza, Mario Gennaro
    Melloni, Elisa Maria Teresa
    Morelli, Marco J.
    Scotti, Giulia Maria
    Benedetti, Francesco
    Bollettini, Irene
    Vai, Benedetta
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2022, 135
  • [4] Metabolomic Identification of Serum Exosome-Derived Biomarkers for Bipolar Disorder
    Du, Yang
    Dong, Ji-Hui
    Chen, Lei
    Liu, Hua
    Zheng, Guang-En
    Chen, Guang-Yang
    Cheng, Yong
    [J]. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY, 2022, 2022
  • [5] PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis
    Haddaway, Neal R.
    Page, Matthew J.
    Pritchard, Chris C.
    McGuinness, Luke A.
    [J]. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 18 (02)
  • [6] The Role of Machine Learning in Diagnosing Bipolar Disorder: Scoping Review
    Jan, Zainab
    AI-Ansari, Noor
    Mousa, Osama
    Abd-alrazaq, Alaa
    Ahmed, Arfan
    Alam, Tanvir
    Househ, Mowafa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (11)
  • [7] Magnetoencephalography resting-state spectral fingerprints distinguish bipolar depression and unipolar depression
    Jiang, Haiteng
    Dai, Zhongpeng
    Lu, Qing
    Yao, Zhijian
    [J]. BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2020, 22 (06) : 612 - 620
  • [8] Metagenomic analysis reveals gut bacterial signatures for diagnosis and treatment outcome prediction in bipolar depression
    Lai, Jianbo
    Li, Ang
    Jiang, Jiajun
    Yuan, Xiuxia
    Zhang, Peifen
    Xi, Caixi
    Wu, Lingling
    Wang, Zheng
    Chen, Jingkai
    Lu, Jing
    Lu, Shaojia
    Mou, Tingting
    Zhou, Hetong
    Wang, Dandan
    Huang, Manli
    Dong, Fengqin
    Li, Ming D.
    Xu, Yi
    Song, Xueqin
    Hu, Shaohua
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2022, 307
  • [9] Shotgun metagenomics reveals both taxonomic and tryptophan pathway differences of gut microbiota in bipolar disorder with current major depressive episode patients
    Lai, Wen-tao
    Zhao, Jie
    Xu, Shu-xian
    Deng, Wen-feng
    Xu, Dan
    Wang, Ming-bang
    He, Fu-sheng
    Liu, Yang-hui
    Guo, Yuan-yuan
    Ye, Shu-wei
    Yang, Qi-fan
    Zhang, Ying-li
    Wang, Sheng
    Li, Min-zhi
    Yang, Ying-jia
    Liu, Tie-bang
    Tan, Zhi-ming
    Xie, Xin-hui
    Rong, Han
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 278 : 311 - 319
  • [10] Applications of machine learning algorithms to predict therapeutic outcomes in depression: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Lee, Yena
    Ragguett, Renee-Marie
    Mansur, Rodrigo B.
    Boutilier, Justin J.
    Rosenblat, Joshua D.
    Trevizol, Alisson
    Brietzke, Elisa
    Lin, Kangguang
    Pan, Zihang
    Subramaniapillai, Mehala
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    Fus, Dominika
    Park, Caroline
    Musial, Natalie
    Zuckerman, Hannah
    Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung
    Ho, Roger
    Rong, Carola
    McIntyre, Roger S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 241 : 519 - 532