Coping with decarbonisation: An inventory of strategies from resistance to transformation

被引:3
作者
Brisbois, Marie Claire [1 ]
Cantoni, Roberto [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sci Policy Res Unit, Brighton, England
[2] Univ Ramon Llull, IQS Sch Management, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Environm Sci & Technol, Barcelona, Spain
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2025年 / 90卷
关键词
Decarbonization; Just transition; Resistance; Adaptation; Transformation; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; TRANSITIONS; ADAPTATION; POWER; SUSTAINABILITY; PARTICIPATION; ELECTRICITY; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102968
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decarbonisation is progressing rapidly and different actors respond to its impacts in different ways. Whether these responses seek to resist decarbonisation, adapt to new realities, or fundamentally transform the social and economic conditions that define decarbonisation contexts depends on the actor groups in question and the resources they are able to draw upon. This paper provides an overview of the kinds of "coping strategies" used by different actor groups in response to decarbonisation policy by inventorying these responses across eleven European carbon intensive regions in transitions. Using newspaper data, local level focus groups and elite interviews, a data set of 651 responses was created. Actions were grouped into 8 themes and 34 discrete strategies. These strategies reveal a wide range of responses. They demonstrate that resistance responses often reflect unaddressed injustices, that many governments are focused on decarbonisation strategies that substitute renewables for fossil fuels without changing wider socioeconomic conditions, and that there is broad appetite on the part of publics for more transformative strategies that allow deeper participation and representation, and reshape who benefits, and how, from the reorganisation of energy systems.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Abraham J, 2017, NEW POLIT SCI, V39, P218, DOI 10.1080/07393148.2017.1301313
[2]  
Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
[3]  
Alidieres Bernard., 2004, Herodote, V113, P48, DOI DOI 10.3917/HER.113.0048
[4]   Oppressive Energopolitics in Africa's Last Colony: Energy, Subjectivities, and Resistance [J].
Allan, Joanna ;
Lemaadel, Mahmoud ;
Lakhal, Hamza .
ANTIPODE, 2022, 54 (01) :44-63
[5]  
Allen I.K., 2021, Dirty Coal: Industrial Populism as Purification in Poland's Mining Heartland
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Summary for policymakers: Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation
[7]   Participation in Environmental Decision-making: Reflecting on Planning and Community Benefits for Major Wind Farms [J].
Armeni, Chiara .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2016, 28 (03) :415-441
[8]  
Armitage D., 2007, Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance
[9]   How to avoid unjust energy transitions: insights from the Ruhr region [J].
Arora, Anmol ;
Schroeder, Heike .
ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 12 (01)
[10]   Just Sustainability Transitions: Politics, Power, and Prefiguration in Transformative Change Toward Justice and [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Wijsman, Katinka ;
van Steenbergen, Frank ;
Jhagroe, Shivant ;
Wittmayer, Julia ;
Akerboom, Sanne ;
Bogner, Kristina ;
Jansen, Esther F. ;
Frantzeskaki, Niki ;
Kalfagianni, Agni .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2024, 49 :519-547