A phenomenological study of women's everyday lived experiences and perceptions in science research organizations in India

被引:0
作者
Jaiswal, Astha [1 ,3 ]
Namrata, Hemant [2 ]
Kumar, Hemant [2 ]
机构
[1] Manipal Univ, Ctr Distance & Online Educ, Jaipur, India
[2] Cent Univ Gujarat, Sch Social Sci, Dept Studies Sci Technol & Innovat Policy, Kundhela, Gujarat, India
[3] Cent Univ Gujarat, Ctr Policy Res dST cpr, Sch Social Sci, Dept Sci & Technol, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
关键词
Chilly climate; glass-ceiling; gender in science; gender barriers; Phenomenology; India; GENDER STRATIFICATION; STEREOTYPES; STEM;
D O I
10.1080/09718524.2024.2411908
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
There has been a significant paucity of representation of women in the fields of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) on a worldwide scale. Women are more likely to be at a disadvantage than men due to the existence of gender prejudices as well as other social and cultural variables. This tendency is also present in India. Feminist scholars within the Science, Technology, and Society field have conducted thorough examinations of the gender component, despite their relatively small representation. This study aims to examine the challenges faced by female scientists in higher education institutions in India to comprehend these issues. It employs a phenomenological approach, using primary data to investigate how female scientists perceive their day-to-day lives and the world around them, and it focuses on the perceptions and experiences of these women. The study finds that women who work in STEMM fields face a wide variety of challenges and roadblocks both on the personal and professional front. In addition, it highlights certain attitudes that have a negative impact on women working in the field of science, such as the rationalization of institutional prejudices and unwillingness to recognize discrimination. It concludes with a few policy implications.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 467
页数:22
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] AISHE, 2023, ALL INDIA SURVEY HIG
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Women in Science
  • [4] Aswathy S, 2022, INTERSECTIONS-GENDER
  • [5] Blumberg R.L., 2008, PROSPECTS, V38, P345, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S11125-009-9086-1, 10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1]
  • [6] Gender and Occupational Outcomes: Longitudinal Assessments of Individual, Social, and Cultural Influences
    Bystydzienski, Jill M.
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 2009, 60 (9-10) : 751 - 753
  • [7] A Model of Threatening Academic Environments Predicts Women STEM Majors' Self-Esteem and Engagement in STEM
    Casad, Bettina J.
    Petzel, Zachary W.
    Ingalls, Emily A.
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 2019, 80 (7-8) : 469 - 488
  • [8] Explaining Underrepresentation: A Theory of Precluded Interest
    Cheryan, Sapna
    Plaut, Victoria C.
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 2010, 63 (7-8) : 475 - 488
  • [9] EXPOsing gender in science: a visual analysis with lessons for gender awareness and science diplomacy
    CohenMiller, A. S.
    Koo, Sejin
    Collins, Neil
    Lewis, Jenifer L.
    [J]. GENDER TECHNOLOGY & DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 24 (02) : 215 - 235
  • [10] Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace
    Cundiff, Jessica L.
    Vescio, Theresa K.
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 2016, 75 (3-4) : 126 - 138