Predicting Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Leading Influence of Environmental Attitudes

被引:0
作者
Hristova, Velina [1 ,2 ]
Haralampiev, Kaloyan [3 ]
Vlaev, Ivo [4 ]
Karabeliova, Sonya [5 ]
机构
[1] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Populat & Human Studies, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
[2] Sofia Univ St Kliment Ohridski, Psychol Dept, Sofia 1504, Bulgaria
[3] Sofia Univ St Kliment Ohridski, Dept Sociol, Fac Philosophy, Sofia 1504, Bulgaria
[4] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
[5] Sofia Univ St Kliment Ohridski, Fac Philosophy, Dept Psychol, Sofia 1504, Bulgaria
关键词
pro-environmental behavior; environmental attitudes; personality traits; self-efficacy; GENERAL ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR; 5; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; SELF-EFFICACY; SCALE; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.3390/bs15030291
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study explored the psychological determinants of pro-environmental behaviors through a multidimensional approach, integrating the roles of self-efficacy, personality traits and environmental attitudes (verbal, actual and affective commitment). While previous research has primarily examined general ecological engagement, this study differentiated between three specific domains: general ecological behaviors, prosocial and volunteering actions in the ecological context, and household chemical usage. A sample of 669 participants completed measures assessing the Big Five personality traits, self-efficacy and environmental commitment dimensions. Regression analyses revealed that environmental attitudes were the strongest predictors of general ecological behavior, while actual commitment, self-efficacy and extraversion played key roles in prosocial engagement and volunteering in the ecological context. Neuroticism and extraversion emerged as the strongest predictors of household chemical usage. The study suggests that the influence of personality traits on pro-environmental behavior may be context-dependent, with certain traits playing a more significant role when the behavior involves direct social engagement. Additionally, our findings emphasize the importance of fostering environmental commitment as a key driver of sustained ecological behavior, rather than relying solely on personality-driven tendencies or self-efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Albrecht G, 2012, ECOPSYCHOLOGY: SCIENCE, TOTEMS, AND THE TECHNOLOGICAL SPECIES, P241
[2]   Capturing the Environmental Impact of Individual Lifestyles: Evidence of the Criterion Validity of the General Ecological Behavior Scale [J].
Arnold, Oliver ;
Kibbe, Alexandra ;
Hartig, Terry ;
Kaiser, Florian G. .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 50 (03) :350-372
[3]   Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure [J].
Ashton, Michael C. ;
Lee, Kibeom .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 11 (02) :150-166
[4]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, DOI [10.1891/08898391.13.2.158, DOI 10.1891/08898391.13.2.158]
[5]   Obsessive Compulsive Symptom Dimensions and Neuroticism: An Examination of Shared Genetic and Environmental Risk [J].
Bergin, Jocilyn ;
Verhulst, Brad ;
Aggen, Steven H. ;
Neale, Michael C. ;
Kendler, Kenneth S. ;
Bienvenu, Oscar J. ;
Hettema, John M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART B-NEUROPSYCHIATRIC GENETICS, 2014, 165 (08) :647-653
[6]   Unearthing the "Green" Personality: Core Traits Predict Environmentally Friendly Behavior [J].
Brick, Cameron ;
Lewis, Gary J. .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2016, 48 (05) :635-658
[7]  
Clayton S., 2017, Mental health and our changing climate: impacts, implications, and guidance, DOI DOI 10.1037/E503122017-001
[8]  
Fraj E., 2007, International Journal of Consumer Studies, V31, P26, DOI [10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00565.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1470-6431.2006.00565.X]
[9]   Personality characteristics in obsessive-compulsive disorder and individuals with subclinical obsessive-compulsive problems [J].
Fullana, MA ;
Mataix-Cols, D ;
Trujillo, JL ;
Caseras, X ;
Serrano, F ;
Alonso, P ;
Menchón, JM ;
Vallejo, J ;
Torrubia, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 43 :387-398
[10]  
Geiger S., 2018, Umweltpsychologie, V22, P69