Visualization of anatomical structures in the carpal region of the horse using cone beam computed tomography in comparison with conventional multidetector computed tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Hagenbach, M. [1 ]
Bierau, J. [1 ]
Cruz, A. M. [1 ]
Koch, C. [2 ]
Manso-Diaz, G. [3 ]
Buettner, K. [4 ]
Staszyk, C. [5 ]
Roecken, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Equine Clin Surg Orthoped, Giessen, Germany
[2] Univ Bern, Swiss Inst Equine Med ISME, Vetsuisse Fac, Dept Clin Vet Med, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Vet Med, Dept Anim Med & Surg, Madrid, Spain
[4] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Unit Biomath & Data Proc, Giessen, Germany
[5] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Inst Vet Anat Histol and Embryol, Fac Vet Med, Giessen, Germany
关键词
horse; carpal joint; cone beam computed tomography; multidetector computed tomography; anatomy; diagnostic; EQUINE MIDCARPAL JOINT; INTERCARPAL LIGAMENTS; LOW-FIELD; PALMAR; CT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2024.1431777
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Introduction In the diagnostics of orthopedic diseases in the horse, diagnostic imaging often plays a decisive role. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging is used in both human and small animal medicine and becoming increasingly popular. To see whether CBCT imaging can be useful in the diagnosis of orthopedic diseases of the carpal region of the horse and to explore possible limitations we compared CBCT images with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images of the carpal region of equine cadaveric specimens.Materials and methods Twenty-eight forelimbs from fifteen horses, slaughtered for reasons unrelated to this study, were examined. Native and contrast enhanced CBCT and MDCT scans were performed. Anatomical structures were blindly evaluated by three independent experienced observers using a visual scoring system previously reported and adapted to the equine carpal region. A descriptive evaluation was carried out as well as Spearman's rank correlation and interobserver agreement was shown by percent agreement (PA).Results Visualization of osseous structures was excellent in both MDCT and CBCT. Articular cartilage could only be assessed in contrast enhanced scans whereby MDCT showed a slightly better visualization than CBCT. Soft tissue structures were generally difficult to assess. An exception were the medial and lateral palmar intercarpal ligament, which could not be visualized in native but were well visualized in contrast enhanced scans in both MDCT and CBCT images.Discussion/conclusion For the evaluation of osseous structures and some intraarticular ligaments after contrast enhancement, CBCT serves as a reliable diagnostic imaging modality for the equine carpal region. However, soft tissue structures and cartilage are imaged more reliably using MDCT.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans
    Simon Veldhoen
    Maximilian Schöllchen
    H. Hanken
    C. Precht
    F. O. Henes
    G. Schön
    H. D. Nagel
    U. Schumacher
    M. Heiland
    G. Adam
    M. Regier
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 790 - 800
  • [42] Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with photon-counting detector computed tomography for dental implant surgery
    Husain, Adib Al-Haj
    Mergen, Victor
    Valdec, Silvio
    Husain, Nadin Al-Haj
    Stadlinger, Bernd
    Essig, Harald
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    Kessler, Peter
    Lie, Suen An Nynke
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    Winklhofer, Sebastian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [43] A comparison of cone beam computed tomography, standard computed tomography and plain radiographs in the evaluation of medial epicondyle humerus fractures
    Rupp, Garrett E.
    Farnsworth, Christine L.
    Hughes, Jessica L.
    Upasani, Vidyadhar V.
    Pennock, Andrew T.
    Bomar, James D.
    Edmonds, Eric W.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2022, 31 (05): : 434 - 441
  • [44] Study of anatomical variations of hepatic vasculature using multidetector computed tomography angiography
    Anwar, Abeer Syed
    Srikala, Jwala
    Papalkar, Amber S.
    Parveez, Mohd Qurram
    Sharma, Ankur
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2020, 42 (12) : 1449 - 1457
  • [45] Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: Comparison with multislice helical computed tomography
    Dahmani-Causse, M.
    Marx, M.
    Deguine, O.
    Fraysse, B.
    Lepage, B.
    Escude, B.
    EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2011, 128 (05) : 230 - 235
  • [46] Comparison of Radiation Exposure Associated With Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Follow-up Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluating Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs
    Steuwe, Andrea
    Geisbuesch, Philipp
    Schulz, Christof J.
    Boeckler, Dittmar
    Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
    Stiller, Wolfram
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2016, 23 (04) : 583 - 592
  • [47] A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions
    Al-Ekrish, A. A.
    Ekram, M.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (02) : 67 - 75
  • [48] Panoramic cone beam computed tomography
    Chang, Jenghwa
    Zhou, Lili
    Wang, Song
    Chao, K. S. Clifford
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) : 2930 - 2946
  • [49] Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics
    Coskun, Ipek
    Kaya, Burcak
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 31 (02) : 55 - 61
  • [50] Characteristics of anatomical landmarks in the mandibular interforaminal region: A cone-beam computed tomography study
    Parnia, Fereidoun
    Moslehifard, Elnaz
    Hafezeqoran, Ali
    Mahboub, Farhang
    Mojaver-Kahnamoui, Haniye
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2012, 17 (03): : E420 - E425