Effect of education based on creative problem-solving and asynchronous online discussions on student creativity in a product design course

被引:2
作者
Tsai, I. -Chia [1 ]
Hsu, Fu-Song [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taichung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Creat Prod Design, 129,Sec 3,Sanmin Rd, Taichung 404336, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Commun Studies, 1001 Daxue Rd, Hsinchu 300093, Taiwan
关键词
Creative problem-solving (CPS); Asynchronous online discussions; Creativity; Cooperative Learning; Product Design Course; KNOWLEDGE; THINKING; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101650
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research in education has employed creative problem-solving (CPS) methodologies to enhance students' learning efficacy. However, the majority of studies have focused on the effect of CPS on individual creativity. Few studies have examined the effects of CPS on teamwork and creativity. This study adopted CPS in a product design course, incorporating teamwork facilitated by an asynchronous online discussion platform. This platform fostered student engagement and iteration in knowledge construction through collaborative discussion. Additionally, experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The study recruited 61 university students divided into two groups. One group underwent CPS-based instruction, which involved knowledge construction, utilization of the asynchronous online discussion platform, and CPS guidance. The second group received conventional instruction, where students were tasked with solving problems set by lecturers. The 14-week experiment revealed that CPS effectively enhanced students' creativity, fostering increased discussion and reflection. Moreover, CPS encouraged students to engage in deeper thinking processes through teamwork, resulting in the development of more optimal product designs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Anderson L. W., 2001, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE, DOI DOI 10.7771/1541-5015.1355
  • [2] Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample
    Besemer, SP
    O'Quin, K
    [J]. CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1999, 12 (04) : 287 - 296
  • [3] Bloom B. S., 1956, Taxonomy of Education Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain
  • [4] The effect of a scientific board game on improving creative problem solving skills
    Chen, Shih-Yeh
    Tsai, Jen-Che
    Liu, Shiang-Yao
    Chang, Chun-Yen
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2021, 41
  • [5] Cronbach LJ., 1977, APTITUDES INSTRUCTIO
  • [6] The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review
    Dochy, F
    Segers, M
    Sluijsmans, D
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1999, 24 (03) : 331 - 350
  • [7] Garrison D. R., 2001, AM J DISTANCE EDUC, V15, P7, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071, DOI 10.1080/08923640109527071, 10.1080/08923640109527071]
  • [8] Grainger T., 2004, Journal of Education for Teaching, V30, P243, DOI DOI 10.1080/0260747042000309475
  • [9] Gray D., 2017, UPDATED EMPATHY MAP
  • [10] Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation
    Hong, Huang-Yao
    Sullivan, Florence R.
    [J]. ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 57 (05): : 613 - 627