Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing

被引:1
作者
Wang, Xinyang [1 ]
Rasidi, Wan Nur Asyiqin [1 ]
Seluakumaran, Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Dept Physiol, Auditory Lab, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
Frequency selectivity; self-administered hearing testing; sensorineural hearing loss; alternative hearing test; hearing screening; AUDITORY FILTER SHAPES; ADULTS; NOISE; SPEECH;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2024.2429025
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis two-part pilot study investigated the feasibility of using a frequency selectivity measure (TFS) to develop a novel hearing screening test for cooperative adults. Study 1 determined the optimal masker level, while Study 2 assessed the reliability of a self-administered TFS test prototype performed at the selected masker level.Design and study sampleStudy 1 (normal hearing, n = 20) examined masker-level effects on TFS using a manual threshold determination method from an earlier study. Study 2 (normal hearing, n = 21; hearing loss, n = 5) evaluated the reliability of a self-administered TFS test using a new automated threshold determination procedure.ResultsModerate masker levels (30-40 dB SPL) were suitable for the TFS measurements, with 40 dB SPL being optimal. Lower level (20 dB SPL) led to floor effects, while higher level (50 dB SPL) broadened cochlear tuning and reduced TFS values. The self-administered test demonstrated +/- 9 dB limit of agreement, with intra-subject absolute mean differences of 1.8-2.7 dB across test frequencies, indicating greater variability compared to the manual method.ConclusionsThe self-administered TFS test is a candidate for hearing screening, particularly for mild sensorineural hearing loss. However, further research is needed to reduce measurement variability and optimise testing for real-world use.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Web- and app-based tools for remote hearing assessment: a scoping review [J].
Almufarrij, Ibrahim ;
Dillon, Harvey ;
Dawes, Piers ;
Moore, David R. ;
Yeung, Wai ;
Charalambous, Anna-Pavlina ;
Thodi, Chryssoula ;
Munro, Kevin J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2023, 62 (08) :699-712
[2]  
Attias Joseph, 2001, Noise Health, V3, P19
[3]   Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms [J].
Badri, Rohima ;
Siegel, Jonathan H. ;
Wright, Beverly A. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2011, 129 (02) :852-863
[4]  
BERGMAN M, 1992, British Journal of Audiology, V26, P15, DOI 10.3109/03005369209077867
[5]   Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing loss detected at the universal newborn hearing screen: Systematic review and meta analysis [J].
Butcher, Emma ;
Dezateux, Carol ;
Cortina-Borja, Mario ;
Knowles, Rachel L. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07)
[6]   PREFERRED METHOD FOR CLINICAL DETERMINATION OF PURE-TONE THRESHOLDS [J].
CARHART, R ;
JERGER, JF .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1959, 24 (04) :330-345
[7]   Hearing Loss in Adults [J].
Cunningham, Lisa L. ;
Tucci, Debara L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (25) :2465-2473
[8]   Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population [J].
de Larrea-Mancera, E. Sebastian Lelo ;
Stavropoulos, Trevor ;
Hoover, Eric C. ;
Eddins, David A. ;
Gallun, Frederick J. ;
Seitz, Aaron R. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 148 (04) :1831-1851
[9]   Global use and outcomes of the hearWHO mHealth hearing test [J].
De Sousa, Karina C. ;
Smits, Cas ;
Moore, David R. ;
Chada, Shelly ;
Myburgh, Herman ;
Swanepoel, De Wet .
DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 8
[10]   Clinical Importance of Binaural Information: Extending Auditory Assessment in Clinical Populations Using a Portable Testing Platform [J].
Diedesch, Anna C. ;
Bock, S. J. Adelaide ;
Gallun, Frederick J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2021, 30 (03) :655-668