Unravelling the spatiotemporal trade-offs and synergies among hydrological ecosystem services in a large floodplain lake

被引:0
作者
Li, Bing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Guishan [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Wan, Rongrong [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Hamilton, David P. [3 ]
Wang, Xueran [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Key Lab Lake & Watershed Sci Water Secur, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Key Lab Watershed Geog Sci, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[3] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Nanjing, Nanjing 211135, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Trade-off and synergy; Spatiotemporal dynamics; Floodplain lake; Hydrological processes; Topographical gradients; LAND-USE; WETLAND; HABITAT; BASIN; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113255
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Understanding the dynamics of ecosystem services (ESs) and their interactions is vital for effective environmental management. This knowledge remains limited in highly dynamic systems, however, particularly floodplain lakes. In this study, spatiotemporal relationships were examined among four leading hydrological ESs (i.e., water supply, flood regulation, nutrient retention, and habitat support) in a large floodplain lake (i.e., Poyang Lake, China). Ecologically relevant hydrological variables were derived through two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling and served as key ESs indicators. Specifically, water supply was represented by lake storage, flood regulation by changes in lake storage, nutrient retention service by TP retention rate calculated through an empirical model, and the habitat support by the area and presence of suitable water depth of two key biodiversity components. Results showed that hydrological processes and topographical gradients regulated the ES dynamics and interactions in Poyang Lake across time and space. The water supply service exhibited a significant co- occurrence relationship with the flood regulation and nutrient retention services, whereas a trade-off occurred with the habitat support service. However, dynamic shifts of trade-offs and synergies occurred among all ES pairs throughout the hydrological year. Spatially, the main lake channel was a hotspot for water supply, flood regulation, and habitat support services, each of which displayed significant synergistic relationships. Trade-offs occurred between water supply and nutrient retention at the southwestern edge of the wetland, as well as between habitat support and the other ESs in the central lake. Moreover, mismatches in the spatial and temporal trade- offs and synergies were identified between water supply and both nutrient retention and the habitat support services, underscoring the need for careful management strategies that can balance the spatiotemporal trade-offs and synergies of multiple ESs. This study offers valuable insights into the dynamic relationships among ESs in floodplain lakes and could provide guidance for coordinated promotion of multiple ESs in Poyang Lake and similar floodplain systems.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Alemu J.B., Richards D.R., Gaw L.-Y.-F., Masoudi M., Nathan Y., Friess D.A., Identifying spatial patterns and interactions among multiple ecosystem services in an urban mangrove landscape, Ecol. Indic., 121, (2021)
  • [2] Aryal K., Maraseni T., Apan A., How much do we know about trade-offs in ecosystem services? A systematic review of empirical research observations, Sci. Total Environ., 806, (2022)
  • [3] Asadolahi Z., Salmanmahiny A., Sakieh Y., Mirkarimi S.H., Baral H., Azimi M., Dynamic trade-off analysis of multiple ecosystem services under land use change scenarios: Towards putting ecosystem services into planning in Iran, Ecol. Complex., 36, pp. 250-260, (2018)
  • [4] Bai Y., Ochuodho T.O., Yang J., Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA. Ecol. Indic., 102, pp. 51-64, (2019)
  • [5] Behrendt H., Huber P., Kornmilch M., Opitz D., Schmoll O., Scholz G., Uebe R., Nutrient emissions into river basins of Germany, Texte, 23, (2000)
  • [6] Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D., Gordon L.J., Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services, Ecol. Lett., 12, 12, pp. 1394-1404, (2009)
  • [7] Cong W., Sun X., Guo H., Shan R., Comparison of the SWAT and InVEST models to determine hydrological ecosystem service spatial patterns, priorities and trade-offs in a complex basin, Ecol. Indic., 112, (2020)
  • [8] Costanza R., De Groot R., Braat L., Kubiszewski I., Fioramonti L., Sutton P., Farber S., Grasso M., Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?, Ecosyst. Serv., 28, pp. 1-16, (2017)
  • [9] Dennedy-Frank P.J., Muenich R.L., Chaubey I., Ziv G., Comparing two tools for ecosystem service assessments regarding water resources decisions, J. Environ. Manage., 177, pp. 331-340, (2016)
  • [10] Duku C., Rathjens H., Zwart S., Hein L., Towards ecosystem accounting: a comprehensive approach to modelling multiple hydrological ecosystem services, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 10, pp. 4377-4396, (2015)